In early 2011, Georgia Secretary of State Brian P. Kemp established an Elections Advisory Council to suggest improvements in Georgia election laws. The Council held public hearings during the spring and early summer of 2011. Members of the public attended these hearings and the issue of ballot access laws came up more often than any other issue. The Council still hasn’t issued its recommendations.
It may be fortunate that the Council is still weighing its ideas. The Virginia presidential primary ballot access controversy has garnered more attention for ballot access than any other news story in decades.
Georgia has a terrible set of ballot access laws, but most people in Georgia aren’t aware of that. In 1943, Georgia went from having extremely easy ballot access to having very difficult ballot access. The laws were made even worse in 1964. Since the 1964 revisions, no one has complied with the 5% petition requirement to get on the ballot for U.S. House, and even in the period 1943-1964, no minor party candidates qualified, although during the 1943-1964 period some independent candidates did qualify.
Georgia newspapers have never educated their readers about this record. Georgia did improve ballot access for statewide office only, in 1979 and again in 1986. But even for statewide office, Georgia has among the most severe requirements. Georgia is one of only four states in which Ralph Nader was never able to qualify for the ballot. The others were Oklahoma, Indiana, and North Carolina. Nader is the person who placed third in 2000, 2004, and 2008. When the presidential candidate who places third consistently can’t get on the ballot, something is wrong.
The robot party hacks on SCOTUS is what is wrong.
Separate is not equal — even in GA after Sherman went thru it in 1864-1865.
Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954 — a mere 57 years ago — almost like thousands of years ago now.
P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.
Equal nominating petitions
Since “No One in Georgia registers as a (D) or (R) on their Voter Registration Card”, why isn’t any Georgian intitled to run for “Any Political Office without even having to Mandatorily specify his/her preference party”?
If someone is (D) or (R) and wants to state so, great,but if they’re a Conservative or Constitution Party Member, why should either of these party be required to get signatures before being allowed on the Voters Ballots”?
Let any Georgian Run for any Political Office on an even playing field. If a Third Party requires Signatures, than so should the (D) and (R) parties, who only have a combined total of 33% of Registered Voters who openingly admit they are with these 2, so called, Majority Parties. The Real Majority Party is Third Party, Independents and those who will not identify themselves associated with any party. Voters should be allowed to vote for anyone and anyone should be allowed to “Run for Office” without having to get Signatures or being forced to run as a (R) or (D)?
Let’s be fair Georgia Legislators.
Pingback: Georgia Secretary of State’s Elections Advisory Council Still Hasn’t Issued Recommendations | ThirdPartyPolitics.us