↓

Home→General→Pew Research Center Poll on November Presidential Election if Ron Paul Were Running Outside the Two Major Parties

Pew Research Center Poll on November Presidential Election if Ron Paul Were Running Outside the Two Major Parties

Posted on January 18, 2012 by admin

On January 18, Pew Research Center released a poll asking how voters would vote in November if the candidates for President were Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul. The results: Obama 44%, Romney 32%, Paul 18%, other or don’t know 6%. See here.

Comments

Pew Research Center Poll on November Presidential Election if Ron Paul Were Running Outside the Two Major Parties — No Comments

ETJB on January 18, 2012 at 11:57 am said:

I doubt that Ron Paul wants to run for President as a third party candidate again. He ran as a Libertarian back in 1988, but he is probably closer to the U.S. Taxpayers/Constitution Party.
Michel Levinson on January 18, 2012 at 12:39 pm said:

People like Ron Paul, especially his thoughts on eliminating the Patriot Act. Seems his numbers should be stronger!
Doremus Jessup on January 18, 2012 at 1:41 pm said:

The bigger question is if Ron Paul were the GOP nominee, how many of the 32% FAUX news hypnotized Romney robots would vote for him? And how many of the 6% other/”don’t knows” would make a decision?
Demo Rep on January 18, 2012 at 1:46 pm said:

See 1992 — MINORITY RULE

DIVIDE AND CONQUER.
Jed Siple 2012 on January 18, 2012 at 3:30 pm said:

#4

What was wrong with the 1992 election? We FINALLY had more than two candidates!
Demo Rep on January 18, 2012 at 4:06 pm said:

# 5 For any math genius folks on this list —

Minority rule = OLIGARCHY

Gee — what’s wrong with having an OLIGARCHY or even a MONARCHY in CONTROL in the nearly dead U.S.A. ???

Any CLUELESS brain dead folks ever read the DOI ???
Pingback: Pew Research Center Poll on November Presidential Election if Ron Paul Were Running Outside the Two Major Parties | ThirdPartyPolitics.us
Jed Siple 2012 on January 18, 2012 at 7:23 pm said:

#6

Bill Clinton won a majority of the electoral college, and a plurality of the popular vote. That’s hardly “minority rule”. Monarchy? Scare word. Oligarchy? We’ve had that for a long time, and it ain’t changing any time soon.
Demo Rep on January 18, 2012 at 8:07 pm said:

Having a gerrymander majority in the Electoral College is one more EVIL fraud in the rotted to the core U.S.A. gerrymander regime.

Good for pre-school kids (and TV talking heads on Sunday mornings) — not for ANY sane adults.

P.R. and nonpartisan App.V. — to END the EVIL rule of the EVIL monarchs and oligarchs in the U.S.A.
Jed Siple 2012 on January 18, 2012 at 10:02 pm said:

I assume P.R. means proportional representation, I have no idea what app. v. is.
citizen1 on January 19, 2012 at 5:37 am said:

Someone should do a poll with Ron Paul as the Republican nominee and Romney as an independent.
Richard G. on January 19, 2012 at 9:22 am said:

citizen1: I think you made a great proposal. You’d probably find Paul and Obama scoring high with Romney low. If Obama was the independent, I bet a similar result would still occur. The disdain against 3rd party representation is so high in this country, that the qualifications of an individual no longer matter as long as they remain in the major two parties. Would show how brainwashed the voters are and how well the two-parties have brainwashed the public.