Canadian Debate of August 6

This newspaper describes the Canadian four-party debate of August 6. The consensus seems to be that the leaders of all four parties did well. Also see this story.

UPDATE: here is a Huffington Post article about the debate. The emphasis of this article is not on the fact that Canada let four party leaders into the debate, but on the substance of what was said, as it relates to how Canada and the United States work together on joint energy and military policies.


Comments

Canadian Debate of August 6 — 5 Comments

  1. CNN would like the Republican Party POTUS candidate choices to be an all-male, homogenized presentation and CNN is itself most likely a homogenized corporate entity itself.

    They need to sell commercials and the POTUS campaign is one national story which can bring in all of America.

    And Canada is suffering from the same problems. BAN and others feel real good about multi-party “debates”. Their way is to compare and divide; “You see how much better Canada has it, with four parties in the debate?”

    I’m sorry, but the theme there is still fighting and conflict, and that’s all pluralists understand.

    BAN, CNN and Huffington Post all see beauty in these multi-party or single-party debates.

    No, the single-winner psychology is a dead end and failed path, whether one party, four or more.

    Sit back and passively watch the so-called debates, and make yourself believe that all is well with democracy when two, four or more parties’ single-winner power-grabbers try to get face time to out-best each other.

    You won’t find any teamwork in such events, each person is out for themselves and has no interest, nor the means, for working together and getting things done.

    That’s where the USA and International Parliaments have an edge over all others; we’re built around teamwork. We thrive on working with diverse people of both genders around marked ballots kept in stacks as proof.

    We have been identifying and attracting team players for two decades and we’re already identified most and then moved on with the team players. The people who want to be here, to vote, think and act as one.

    We can come together and find direction, based on the principle that a 50/50 tie is broken by one vote, and our team all agrees on the results because we’re using many multiples of alternatives simultaneously, the more the better, and that is so much more advanced than the yes/no, my way/no way and veto/pass psychology that the lowly pluralists play in every day.

    The USA and International Parliaments can unite to brainstorm, raise money for our own cameras, equipment, directors, events, and we have the self-correcting acumen like none of those mentioned in these bland dribbles by the pluralist establishment media.

    We are certainly not bought in to anything BAN writes about. BAN is less evolved. BAN is primitive.

    BAN is for the lone musicians, each trying to play louder than the next one.

    The 9th USA Parliament is more like an orchestra consisting of thousands of players in sweet and delicate harmony.

    BAN’s instrument may be made of solid gold and our team may be beating sticks on rocks, but the harmony and synchronization of teamwork marching forward in a united parade will be far more sweet than the drone of the single-winner district politicians in Canada and the USA.

    Nobody has it as good as our team. Our team has a brighter future than any one person in the world. I am totally amazed at the new units who joined the parade just today alone. They know what we’re about and that’s what attracts them to the team. We’re like nothing anyone has ever experienced before. Totally new to everyone.

  2. Be nice, Richard! You said he was “a sweet man” but you didn’t tell us he had been assimilated!

  3. That’s an insult to the borg. Just for that we will make your assimilation unusually painful.

  4. Nonstop New Age borg media about timebomb stuff — national debts, destruction of the eco-system, destruction of older cities and suburbs, etc.

    The political- economic insanity in the USA since 1929 matches the 1776-1860 lead up to the horrific Civil WAR I in 1861-1865.

    It took about 400 years for the Roman Republic to collapse into Emperor tyranny, death and destruction.

    NO way that the USA will survive that long with its timebomb USA Constitution and its many super-defects.

    History note again — P.R. came along in the 1820s-1840s — about 50-70 years TOO LATE.
    —-
    P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.