New Mexico Supreme Court Summarily Affirms Lower Court Decision on Independent Candidate Petition Law

On August 13, the New Mexico Supreme Court issued a one-sentence opinion in Miller v Padilla, S-1-SC-37171. It says the lower court opinion is affirmed. The case had been filed by independent candidate Carol Miller, who wanted to run for County Commission in Rio Arriba County as an independent. The New Mexico election law generally requires all non-presidential candidates to submit petitions, no matter whether they are running in a primary or in the general election. But a quirk in the law says members of major parties don’t need petitions to run in primaries for county office, yet everyone else does. Miller argued that the New Mexico State Constitution, which says elections shall be “free and equal”, meant that if members of major parties don’t need signatures, therefore no one should need them. But the lower court denied the case with no written opinion and now the State Supreme Court won’t write an opinion either.


Comments

New Mexico Supreme Court Summarily Affirms Lower Court Decision on Independent Candidate Petition Law — 2 Comments

  1. Try to go to USA DA and get the entire NM regime indicted/arrested for violations of US code 18-241 and 18-242

  2. Again- the *free and equal* words came from the 1689 English Bill of Rights Act —

    after the tyrant King James II tried to take over England in the 1680s.

    Mystery – who brought the words to NM — and when ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.