An amicus curiae brief, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Utah Republican Party v Cox, has been filed by some minor parties, along with other groups, including the Coalition for Free & Open Elections (COFOE). The brief is also joined by the Utah Native American caucus (which contains eleven legislators from both major parties), and the Idaho Republican Party.
The minor parties who signed the brief are the Green Party, the Constitution Party, and the American Independent Party. Also these state Libertarian Parties joined: California, Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. Here is the brief.
Another amicus has been filed by Judicial Watch. See it here.
Yet another amicus has been filed by Eagle Forum Legal Defense Fund. See it here.
The next event in this case will be when the U.S. Supreme Court sets a conference date. Also, the Court may then ask the state to respond.
How many ANTI-Democracy monarchs/oligarchs in the amicus folks ???
—
PR and AppV
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_primaries
wiki
NO going back to the EVIL ROTTED PAST of Boss tyrants
— with their rotted bribes, threats and purges.
Too many New Age political history MORONS to count.
2000 CA Dems case — more UN-constitutional JUNK to be over-ruled now.
No more “White Primaries”.
The United Coalition USA is bringing the 100%, the collaboration of the whole, for intra-party unity instead of unilateralism.
The United Coalition USA is bringing the correct mathematics for pure proportional representation (PPR) and we are welcoming collaboration with the 360+ candidates for POTUS.
The Herd/Ogle [Libertarian/One] for President 2020 campaign, along with the USA Humanitarian Party, will conduct the PPR Electoral College vote, AKA the “10th USA Parliament Election of 2020”, on Earth Day 2020 in Monterey California, USA, North America, Earth.
We are men united for our opposite gender ahead of our own with consecutively ranked alternating genders thereafter.
Not like the ego-maniacs, psychopathic conciepted males who only promote themselves, but humble team players using the same mathematics of pure proportional representation as one PPR Electoral College, the only way to think, act and vote as a national team.
There are plenty of single-winner district power grabbers but the United Coalition USA has a better way.
The party bosses don’t want anyone to know because they are biased against outsiders.
All is forgiven, 1/1/2019 is a new year, a new fresh start for the team:
http://www.usparliament.org/google2020.php
Why must a citizen be restricted to participating in the nominating activities of only one party? Why should the government enforce this restriction? If the party bosses may dictate how nominees are chosen, why should the government pay for that activity? Why should the government keep track of the members of a party? A system where political parties are accorded nomination rights, necessarily entangles the party and the state. The state must determine which parties are “qualified”. But the currently qualified parties control qualification regulation.
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Similarly, American political partties are instituted among registered voters, deriving their just powers from the party members. If political parties are bodies of registered voters, any powers executive committees are derivative of the voters. There is NO separation between political parties and the members.
If political parties are to become truly private organization that control their own membership then candidates must qualify as individuals. Party labels should be removed from ballots. If a voter has no clue who to vote for, then they can either pick randomly or skip the race. Political parties can also educate voters and distribute slate cards, just as now is done for primaries.
In Texas, it is a felony to vote in both primaries.
ALL [top 2 primary areas] or SOME PUBLIC ELECTORS/VOTERS [in subgroups in other areas] do PUBLIC nominations of PUBLIC candidates for PUBLIC offices at PUBLIC elections via PUBLIC election LAW.
The 2000 CA Dem case — SCOTUS MORON HACKS at work as usual >>> more JUNK to be OVER-ruled.
PRIVATE folks can endorse whoever in their clubby meetings — with about ZERO effect on the general public.
Mid 1950s SCOTUS JUNK op — also to be OVER-ruled.
SCOTUS HACKS are very much dumb and dumber than the HACK Prezs who nominate them.