Florida Acknowledges that Ex-Felon Voting Rights Lawsuit Probably is Not Moot, Because Two Plaintiffs Still Not Eligible to Register

On December 6, the Florida Secretary of State filed a brief in Hand v Scott, 18-11388, in the Eleventh Circuit.  This is the case on whether Florida’s procedures for restoring voting rights for ex-felons are arbitrary and therefore violate due process.  The voters of Florida passed an initiative last month to restore voting rights for most ex-felons.  The Eleventh Circuit had asked each side if the case is therefore moot, and this latest brief was filed per that request. 

The Florida government brief admits that two of the plaintiff voters have not yet paid all court costs and fees that they are required to have paid if they want their voting rights restored.  Therefore, unless that changes, they still can’t register to vote.  Therefore, the case, as to them, appears not to be moot. 


Comments

Florida Acknowledges that Ex-Felon Voting Rights Lawsuit Probably is Not Moot, Because Two Plaintiffs Still Not Eligible to Register — 7 Comments

  1. One more brain dead court [due to SCOTUS MORONS]–

    Civil Complaint

    Past and/or ongoing and/or future civil injury/violation

    — IE $$$ DAMAGES against govt hacks.

  2. PAST injuries do NOT magically go away.

    Much too difficult for MORONS in SCOTUS and lower courts.

    Layers of MORONS in the courts since 4 July 1776.

  3. @DR,

    The governor was likely named in virtue of his office. Any judgment would be paid by Florida. The case was not certified as a class action. What do you think was the injury in this case?

  4. JR can look up the original complaint and post a link.


    One more part of a Democracy USA const Amdt —

    Each Citizen of the United States who is or will be 18 or more years old on an Election Day in his or her residence precinct and who has/is registered to vote shall be an Elector in all elections on such Election Day in such precinct.

    NOOOO mental or crimes stuff — always used by the HACKS to reduce Electors-Voters.

    ANY JR hair-splitting loopholes ???

    ALL sorts of FATAL stuff in the USA and State Consts to be blasted out and repaired.

    Note – various rotted States have *special* elections for special interest gangs with restrictions on who is an Elector in such special elections — water war districts, etc.

  5. @DR,

    You were the person advocating personal liability for persons acting in their official capacity. Explain why?

    The plaintiffs wanted the Florida officials to stop doing something. Florida will stop doing something as soon as the Constitutional amendment goes into effect.

    The 11th Circuit has taken no action on the appeal, other than to issue a stay. The appropriate action would be to remand to the district court to make a specific determination with regard to two persons who have not completed all terms of their sentence,

    Do you think that the courts should compel The Congress to propose your amendment, including requiring ratification by convention, and requiring voters to elect delegates who will support ratification of your amendment.

    Are you disenfranchised by reason of felony, participation in rebellion, or mental incapacity?

  6. The SCOTUS HACKS have perverted the very limited *immunity* of Congress HACKS in Congress debates to near total immunity of ALL HACKS — legis, exec, judic — USA / State/ Local = TOTAL LAWLESS regimes.

    The moron courts can declare the minority rule gerrymander regimes UNCONSTITUTIONAL

    — things will then happen semi-automatically.

    *SPECIFIC* DETERMINATIONS IN ALL CASES.

    NO on the last INQUISITION QUESTION.


    A VIDEO TAPE RECORD OF TOTAL EXISTENCE NOW REQUIRED FOR ALL PERSONS ??? — ESP. PREZ CANDIDATES.

    EG HOW MANY TIMES DID H. CLINTON AND SANDERS AND PELOSI AND SCHUMER READ AND LOVE THE RED COMMUNIST MANIFESTO ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.