Liz Mair has this article in The Bulwark, gathering facts that rebut the common assumption about “spoilers” in recent U.S. presidential elections. The Bulwark is a new on-line opinion journal that inherited much of the staff of The Weekly Standard.
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
Men, the PPR Elector College has a different mathematical system, slightly different from the US Constitution but it still works. It’s a new way to elect President and Vice President, but we only get one vote, even though the US Constitution reads that every voter, votes for both President and Vice President, as the Electors.
Under ranked choice voting (RCV), the team elects the President with 33.33% (plus one vote) and Vice President with 33.33% (plus one vote) each simultaneously on one paper ballot, and every voter uses numerals (1,2,3,4,etc.), but only one Elector vote counts for either Prez or VP.
Should your vote count to elect President in the first rounds, then it doesn’t get applied to VP as the next rounds get completed.
The voters who weren’t part of the first 33.33% (plus one vote) who elected President are put aside, and only the remaining votes might count towards VP as the round of vote counting is completed for VP.
It’s guaranteed that 66.66% (plus two votes) will count, but only one vote counts, not two, and the US Constitution implies that two votes are cast.
We need to work together to make sure that the California Libertarian Party elects a unity of both a male and female, and one Libertarian and one not a Libertarian, so to have the unity, because they allow two votes and that way one faction with 50% (plus one vote) can elect both names in one vote for Prez followed by the second vote for VP.
More people will like that PPR Elector College because 66.66% (plus two votes) count and that’s more US voters than 50% (plus one vote).
This voting is similar to “Limited Voting” like Japan, but the RCV helps make sure everyone’s vote counts until the Droop Quota is matched
Droop Quota is 50% (plus one vote) for single winners and 33.33% (plus one vote) for two-winner districts and Prez/VP is the only at-large district in USA, and fortunately there are two seats..
I am running one a woman’s ticket. We have plenty of choices for whom us men may pick on our team, and we have many parties/categories to choose from, and we need a woman who is a team player for US President who agrees to consensus between President and Vice President if possible because that is unity between two differing parties. The decision-making is another system of voting but both have to agree and there is no tie-breaker between two voters (President and Vice President).
It’s also OK to have disagreement between the Prez and VP, the agreement, is likely primarily to be that the two cooperate on setting policy on voting. Voting policy absolutely must be 100% pure proportional representation and all single-winner districts (i.e. the two-party system) get eliminated.
That way will need to assure that we have collaboration between the Prez and VP to help get things done faster.
The One Party has a female nominee for President but she is from Canada. We are looking for a US citizen so to follow the US Constitution and we need a woman who is a team player and who demonstrates the teamwork during the campaign.
If you can help the One Party succeed, please donate, or sign up for free, to help our search for a female candidate at the Go Ogle [One] for US President home page,
PULEEEZE… make it stop!
More junk
How many voters LIE to the moron pollsters to be *politically correct* / screw up the poll ???
Please Richard, ban Ogle. All he does is spam.
If he submits more than a single comment for any particular blog post, and neither comment relates to the content of the blog post, then I remove all but the one comment.