Opponents of Electing Presidential Electors-at-Large File Reply Brief in South Carolina Case

On September 9, this reply brief was filed in the Fourth Circuit in Baten v McMaster, 19-1297. The issue is whether the U.S. Constitution bars states from electing presidential electors on an at-large basis. This brief was filed by the opponents of at-large elections. The case will now be set for oral argument. It is one of four similar cases. The others are in Massachusetts, Texas, and California.

Briefing is complete in the California case, and it may be argued as early as January 2020. Briefing is still not completed in the Texas case. The Massachusetts case was argued September 10, 2019. All four of these cases lost in U.S. District Court.


Comments

Opponents of Electing Presidential Electors-at-Large File Reply Brief in South Carolina Case — 1 Comment

  1. One more 1 / 14 / 15 Amdt perversion attempt.

    WILL THE CASES GET TO SCOTUS NOT LATER THAN JUNE 2020 ???

    Abolish the super-timebomb MINORITY RULE gerrymander Electoral College.

    1860 LINCOLN = 750,000 PLUS DEAD IN 1861-1866

    — MANY EX-SLAVE STATES STILL STONE AGE POLITICAL BASKET CASES.

    NONPARTISAN APPV FOR ALL EXEC/JUDIC OFFICES – PENDING CONDORCET.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.