U.S. District Court Judge Robert Pitman will hear part of Miller v Hughes on Thursday, October 31. This is the Texas ballot access case filed by several minor parties earlier this year. The hearing will only be concerned with whether the new law on filing fees for convention parties should be enjoined for the 2020 election. It will be at 9 a.m. in Austin.
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
Yet another chance to get EQUAL ballot access via 14-1 EPC —
IF, repeat IF, the lawyers have ANY 14-1 brain cells.
—
Separate is NOT equal. Brown v Bd of Ed. 1954 — now a mere 65 years ago.
Each election is NEW.
EQUAL ballot access tests.
—
MUST be in original Complaint / brief — too late on appeals.
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2019/10/15/hollister-rocked-by-4-8-magnitude-san-andreas-fault-earthquake/
SAVE BAN !!! — from CA fires, quakes, floods, snows, droughts, locust plagues, politicians, etc. !!!!
Equal ballot access laws is no laws at all. The voters can write-in any candidate they please for any office. All quotas are ballot censorship no matter how small the quota financially.
What if you have to pay a government monopoly to use any words in the dictionary even if the rate was one dollar per hundred thousand words?
DFR –
Utopia — blank ballots – decipher write-ins — *intent* guesses for any complex name
vs
Reality — limited size ballots with some names of candidates- scanner vote counts
Voters have the right to write illegibly without seeking assistance and take the consequences. Limiting the number of names printed on a ballot is rationing opinion and all such rationing is biased discrimination. Why the fear of having voters express their genuine opinions?