Last month it was reported that the Nebraska Secretary of State had rejected the petition for party status of the Legal Marijuana Now Party, and had refused to allow the party to supplement its petition, even though the deadline for that petition is not until August 2022. However, the Secretary of State has now begun examining the signatures more carefully, and has already found some valid signatures that had earlier been rejected. The Secretary of State and the party are working together to perhaps find another 22 valid signatures.
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
ONE voter forms –
mail them in.
Aren’t you the same guy who claims a lot of votes were lost in the mail?
Single issue party….
Duterte’s solution to the problem:
“If they are there in your neighbourhood, feel free to call us, the police or do it yourself if you have the gun. You have my support. If he fights and fights to the death, you can kill him. I will give you a medal… If you are involved in drugs, I will kill you. You son of a whore, I will really kill you.”
We have two pot parties in Minnesota with major party status. Last election cycle, Republicans (who I dont think actually wanted legal weed) ran on the ticket to hurt the DFL, which, largely, backs legal weed.
If the DFL largely backed legalized weed, than I wouldn’t think there would be two weed-based third parties. Maybe these third parties don’t put as much faith in the DFL’s weed policy as you do.
Charlie —
How many FAKE sig collectors on candidate/issue pets who trash any sigs gathered ???
—
Snail mail will be major upgraded for election stuff in HR 1.
I don’t know. Do you? My guess is very few, but that’s just a guess. As for HR 1, it doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell in the Senate.
Michael
The DFL State House backs legal weed and ranked choice voting. The GOP control the state Senate and oppose both measures.
It’s probably not enough of a top priority for them according to the legal marijuana now parties.
I can’t speak for these marijuana-based third parties, but I can say that if the membership of these third parties had faith that the DFL was doing all they could to fight for legal marijuana, then they wouldn’t be in these third parties. Like Mark said, it may be an issue of perception, or maybe that, while legal weed is on the DFL’s agenda, these third parties don’t believe they’re fighting hard for it.