Gatewood Galbraith Dies

On January 3, 2012, Gatewood Galbraith died. He was one of the Reform Party’s most successful nominees for Governor of any state. In 1999, as the Reform Party nominee, he had polled 15.42% for Governor of Kentucky, in a race against a Democrat, a Republican, and a Natural Law Party opponent. The only other Reform Party nominees for Governor of any state who ever polled more than 10% of the vote were Jesse Ventura in Minnesota in 1998 and Tom Golisano in New York in 2002. See this news story. He was 64. The story does not mention the cause of death.

Galbraith also ran as an independent for Governor of Kentucky in November 2011. He did well in that race as well, polling 8.99%. Here is his wiki page. Thanks to Larry West for this news.

Member of Canadian Parliament Leaves Conservative Party and Says His Party is “Civil Libertarian”

According to this story, a member of the Canadian House of Commons, Peter Goldring, has left the Conservative Party and now lists his party affiliation as “Civil Libertarian.” He is from Alberta and has been in Parliament since 1997. Assuming that he should be classified as an independent, he is the only independent in the Canadian House of Commons.

Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, and Rick Santorum Almost Certain to Fail to Qualify in District of Columbia Primary

The petition deadline for presidential candidates running in the District of Columbia presidential primary is January 4, 2012. The District of Columbia’s web page, which was updated on January 3, show that only four Republican presidential candidates have even picked up blank petition forms. Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman have filed their petitions, but Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich have not, although they did pick up petition blanks earlier. Chances are that Paul and Gingrich will file tomorrow. But it is extremely likely that Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, and Rick Santorum won’t qualify, because they haven’t started collecting, and the deadline is tomorrow. Republicans need 296 signatures, and only registered Republicans can sign.

President Obama has already filed his signatures, and no one else took out petition blanks to appear on the Democratic primary ballot. Jill Stein has taken out petition blanks to appear on the Green Party presidential primary, but she hasn’t filed them yet. She needs 41 valid signatures of registered Greens.

West Virginia’s U.S. House District Boundaries Invalidated by 3-Judge U.S. District Court

On January 3, a 3-judge U.S. District Court invalidated West Virginia’s U.S. House district boundaries. The vote was 2-1. Here is the opinion, which is interesting reading, especially the second half. The plan was rejected because one of the districts has a population of almost 5,000 more voters than one of the other districts. The opinion points out that no other state that has finished redistricting since the 2010 census has a population deviation greater than .03% (except for the Arkansas plan). But West Virginia’s plan has a .79% deviation.

One of the interesting facts in the opinion is that West Virginia and Iowa are the only states that have ever had at least two districts, in which the district boundaries have never split a county. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Much Commentary on Virginia Ballot Access Shows Utter Ignorance of History of Ballot Access Litigation

Some commentators about politics and election law have recently expressed the opinion that it would be illegitimate to change the Virginia presidential primary ballot access law between now and the March 6, 2012 presidential primary in that state. They sometimes say it is immoral to “change the rules in the middle of the game.” For example, see this commentary by Jay Sekulow.

These commentators don’t seem to know that in every presidential election starting in 1968, courts have “changed the rules” and permitted candidates to get on the November ballot even though those candidates didn’t “play by the rules.” These commentators don’t understand how bad the U.S. ballot access laws are. In 48 of the 50 states, courts have invalidated at least one ballot access law, during the period starting in 1968.

In 1968, George Wallace would not have been on the November ballot if he had not won constitutional lawsuits against Alaska, Idaho, and Ohio. Also in 1968, courts put the presidential nominees of the Communist Party on the ballot in Minnesota, the Socialist Workers Party on the ballot in New York, and the Freedom and Peace Party on the ballot in New York.

In 1972, courts put the presidential nominees of the Communist Party on the ballot in the District of Columbia, Illinois, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania; and the Socialist Workers Party on in the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania.

In 1976, courts put Eugene McCarthy on the ballot as an independent presidential candidate in Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Vermont. They put the Libertarian presidential nominee on the ballot in California, Nebraska, and Tennessee.

In 1980, courts put John B. Anderson and/or his vice-presidential running mate on in Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. They put the Libertarian Party nominee on the ballot in Louisiana and West Virginia. They put the Citizens Party nominee on the ballot in California. They put the Communist Party nominee on the ballot in Michigan.

In 1984, courts put the Libertarian presidential nominee on the ballot in Nebraska, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Wyoming. They put the Communist Party nominee on the ballot in Michigan and Pennsylvania. They put the New Alliance Party nominee on the ballot in Massachusetts and Michigan. They put the Citizens Party nominee on the ballot in Michigan. They put the Populist Party nominee on in Idaho. They put the Socialist Workers Party nominee on in Michigan.

In 1988, courts put the New Alliance Party nominee on the ballot in California and Michigan. They put the Workers World nominee on in New Mexico. They put the Libertarian Party nominee on in Kansas. They put independent presidential candidate Eugene McCarthy on in Michigan. They put the Socialist Workers nominee on in Michigan.

In 1992, courts put the Libertarian Party nominee on in Alaska. They put the New Alliance Party nominee on in Nevada. They put the U.S. Taxpayers Party nominee on in Alaska. They put independent presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche on in Ohio. They put the Natural Law Party nominee on in Nevada, and the Populist Party nominee on in Nevada.

In 1996, courts put the Libertarian Party nominee on in Arizona, Florida, and West Virginia. They put the Reform Party nominee on in Arkansas and Maine. They put the Natural Law Party nominee on in South Carolina.

In 2000, courts put the Green Party nominee on the ballot in Illinois and West Virginia. They put the Reform Party nominee on the ballot in Connecticut.

In 2004, courts put the Socialist Party nominee on the ballot in Colorado, and put independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader on the ballot in Arkansas, Colorado, and New Mexico.

In 2008, courts put the Libertarian Party nominee on in Massachusetts and Ohio, and the Green Party nominee on in Ohio, and the Socialist Party nominee on in Ohio, and the Constitution Party on in Ohio.

Already for the 2012 presidential election, a court has put the Libertarian Party on the ballot in Ohio.

Georgia Administrative Judge Refuses to Dismiss Challenge to President Obama’s Ballot Placement on Democratic Presidential Primary

On January 3, Georgia State Administrative Judge Michael M. Malihi refused to dismiss a lawsuit that challenges President Barack Obama’s spot on the March 6 Georgia Democratic presidential primary. The lawsuit was filed by various Georgia voters, who argue that Obama does not meet the constitutional qualifications to be President. These voters will now have an opportunity to present evidence, in a hearing set for January 26, unless the January 3 order is overturned on appeal.

The January 3 ruling is four pages, and says that the Georgia law, permitting challenges to the ballot position of candidates, applies to presidential primaries just as much as it applies to any other primary or election. Here is an article about the lawsuit that appeared two weeks ago in the Atlanta Journal Constitution. One of the attorneys who brought the case, J. Mark Hatfield, is a Republican state representative from Waycross who introduced a bill last year, HB 401, to require presidential candidates to submit proof of qualifications. That bill did not pass. Another of the attorneys is Orly Taitz. The case is Farrar v Obama. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.