Republicans Try to Disqualify Democratic Opponents at Last Minute in 3 States

During the two weeks, Republicans have filed lawsuits to disqualify various Democratic nominees in Alabama, California and Ohio. Since the ballots have already been printed, and since these lawsuits could have been filed months ago, it is unlikely that courts will take them seriously. In Alabama, the Republican nominee for Attorney General filed a lawsuit to block counting any votes for four particular Democratic State Senators who failed to file a particular campaign finance report months ago. In California, some Republicans filed a lawsuit to block counting any votes for the Democratic nominee for Attorney General, on the grounds that during part of the past five years, he was only an inactive member of the Bar. And in Ohio, some Republicans filed a lawsuit to disqualify the Democratic nominee for Governor on the grounds that he doesn’t actually live at the address where he is registered to vote.

In California, a lower state court ruled that the case should not be expedited, so it won’t be heard until after the election. In Ohio, the state court of appeals rejected the lawsuit. The Alabama lawsuit has a hearing on October 31.

Kentucky Libertarian at 7% in US House Poll

A SurveyUSA poll released on October 24 shows these results for US House in Kentucky’s 4th district: Republican incumbent 46%, Democrat 44%, Libertarian 7%, undecided 3%. A similar poll two weeks ago had showed the Libertarian, Brian Houillion, at 6%. Kentucky’s 4th district is along the Ohio River east of Louisville; its largest population centers are the Kentucky suburbs of Cincinnati.

Massachusetts Lawsuit Against Listing Incumbents First on the Ballot

Massachusetts is the only state that automatically prints incumbents first on the ballot. A lawsuit challenging that law, filed in 2004, but dormant since then, is finally coming to life. The case is White v Galvin, Plymouth Co., ca04-427, and it has a status conference in a few weeks.

Also pending is a federal case in Maryland against the Maryland law, putting candidates on the ballot in alphabetical order. It is Schaefer v Lamone, L-06-896.

Both sets of plaintiffs argue that states should use some random procedure to decide order of candidates on the ballot.