Tennessee Bill for Presidential Candidate Birth Certificates

On February 7, a bill was introduced in the Tennessee Senate to keep presidential candidates off primary ballots, and also off the general election ballot, unless the national political party submits a birth certificate for such presidential candidate. As noted earlier on this site, there had been somewhat similar bills introduced already this year in ten other states. This is the only bill in any state that puts the responsibility on a national party committee to submit such documents in a presidential primary.

The Tennessee bill, SB 366, does not require independent presidential candidates to file a birth certificate. The bill’s sponsor is Senator Mae Beavers (R-Mount Juliet).

Arizona Proposal for Filing Fees instead of Petitions

The Arizona Constitution prohibits filing fees for candidates. Five state Representatives have introduced a proposed constitutional amendment, which would delete the constitutional prohibition, and authorize the legislature to provide for filing fees in lieu of petitions, both for primary ballot access and general election ballot access. The proposal is HCR 2023. If the legislature passes it, then it would appear as a ballot question in the November 2012 for the voters to decide if they agree.

Arizona Bill, Improving Ballot Access and Making Other Changes, Passes House Judiciary Committee

On February 10, Arizona HB 2304 passed the House Judiciary Committee unanimously. Now it goes to the House Rules Committee. This bill contains all the Secretary of State’s recommendations for election law changes, including some ballot access improvements. It says when a party qualifies for the ballot, it then retains its status as a qualified party for the next two elections. Also it legalizes out-of-state circulators for all types of petitions, although out-of-state circulators must register with the Secretary of State before working.

Also, the bill makes it easier for candidates of a newly-qualifying party to get on their own party’s primary ballot. As far as is known, this is the first ballot access improvement bill this year to have made progress in any state’s legislature.

The Judiciary Committee amended the bill’s provisions about electioneering at the polls. The bill, as amended, clarifies that buttons and clothing worn by voters at the polling place is permitted, unless the buttons or clothing relate to something that is on the ballot. This change is undoubtedly because some polling place officials last year tried to eject voters who were wearing clothing that mentioned the Tea Party, which was not on the ballot in Arizona as a separate political party. Under the amendment, Tea Party buttons and clothing would be permitted (until such time as the Tea Party in Arizona gets itself on the ballot as a separate political party, of course).

Florida Legislative Leaders Seem Inclined to Keep January Presidential Primary

According to this story in the Orlando, Florida Sentinel, Republican leaders in the state legislature seem inclined to retain Florida’s January presidential primary. Although bills are pending in both houses of the legislature to move the presidential primaries to March, the bills are sponsored by Democrats, and Republicans have a majority in both houses of the legislature. The bills are SB 860 and HB 695.

Hawaii Bills for Instant Runoff Voting in Special Elections

Bills have been introduced in both houses of the Hawaii legislature to provide that special elections should be conducted using Instant Runoff Voting. The House bill, HB 638, was to have had a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee on February 1, but that hearing has been postponed to February 15. The identical Senate bill, SB 667, doesn’t have a hearing date yet.

Hawaii special elections include party labels on the ballot, but parties don’t have nominees. There is only one round in special elections. On May 22, 2010, Hawaii had held a special U.S. House election, in which the three leading candidates were Republican Charles Djou, and Democrats Colleen Hanabusa and Ed Case. Djou won with 39.4% of the total vote cast. The two leading Democrats, together, polled 58.4%, but they were both defeated since Djou polled the most votes. In November 2010, under a normal system in which parties have nominees, Djou was defeated.

Many Oregon Bills Would Affect Minor Parties

The Oregon House Interim Committee on Rules has introduced many bills that affect minor parties and independent candidates. HB 2428 would eliminate fusion. Several parties could still nominate a candidate, but the candidate could only have one party label on the ballot. The candidate would choose which party label to use.

HB 2442, and also SB 263, would go into effect immediately and would say that no political party can have “independent” as its name. The bill would let the ballot-qualified Independent Party choose a new name. The bill would also provide that independent candidates, who are now on the ballot as “Nonaffiliated” would in the future be on the ballot as “Nonaffiliated/Independent.” The bill says that letting any party call itself the Independent Party is confusing.

HB 2432 says that party labels must be printed on the ballot without being abbreviated. In 2010, the Oregon Secretary of State permitted some counties to show only party abbreviations on the ballot. Virtually every voter knows what “Dem” and “Rep” means, but the abbreviations for minor parties are much less understood. For example, the Green Party was abbreviated “PGP” (which is an acronym for “Pacific Green Party”).

HB 2421 would require qualified minor parties to forward a list of voters who participate in their nomination process. Most ballot-qualified minor parties in Oregon nominate by convention, but the Independent Party nominated with a mail-ballot, paid for by the party itself.

An Oregon bill that only affects the major parties is HB 2492, which eliminates party officer elections from the primary ballot, and says parties should choose their officials any way they wish, but at their own expense.