U.S. Department of Justice Wants More Information about California’s “Top-Two” Before it Grants Clearance

California is one of the states that must ask for U.S. Justice Department approval before it alters its election laws.  On August 16, 2010, California had forwarded a copy of the new “top-two” law that goes into effect in 2011, to the Voting Rights Section of the U.S. Justice Department.

On October 25, the Voting Rights Section replied to California, with questions about how “top-two” will affect ethnic and racial minorities.  The questions are limited to past elections in the four covered counties, Kings, Merced, Monterey and Yuba Counties.  After the state answers the questions, the Voting Rights Section has 60 days to evaluate the answers.  “Top-two” cannot be into effect until this process is completed.  Thanks to Rob Richie for this news.

Louisiana Holds 6-Candidate U.S. Senate Debate

On October 27, Louisiana held a televised U.S. Senate debate in which six candidates participated.  See this story.  The debate sponsors invited each political party nominee, and also invited anyone who had either held elected office recently, or who had raised or spent $50,000.  That enable two of the independent candidates to be invited.  Participating were Republican incumbent David Vitter, Democrat Charlie Melancon, Libertarian Randall Hayes, Reform Party nominee William McShan, and independent candidates Mike Spears and Ernest Wooton.

Anyone can watch the debate using this link, which is at the TV station’s web page, wdsu.com.

6th Circuit Upholds Tennessee Ban on Ex-Felon Voting by 2-1 Vote

On October 28, the 6th circuit ruled 2-1 that Tennessee may continue to bar ex-felons from registering to vote if they owe child support or restitution payments.  See the opinion, Johnson v Bredesen, here.  This is another case, similar to the one decided two days ago by the 9th circuit on voter registration, that had been pending for over a year since the oral argument.

The majority consists of Judges Deborah Cook and Thomas Ludington, Bush Jr. appointees.  The dissent is by Karen Moore, a Clinton appointee.  The dissent is considerably longer than the majority opinion, and argues that the law does not pass the rational basis test, and that inability to pay child support is not a crime.

Alaska Supreme Court Tentatively OK’s List of Declared Write-in Candidates at Polls

On October 27, the Alaska Supreme Court reversed an order of a lower state court, and said that the list of declared write-in candidates may be shown to voters at the polls who ask to see the list.  See this story.  UPDATE:  see this longer story, which says that the ballots of voters who asked to see the list should be kept separate, in case a further appeal reverses the order.  FURTHER UPDATE:  here is the 3-page order of the Alaska Supreme Court, thanks to Rick Hasen’s ElectionLawBlog.

Connecticut Republicans Sue to Disqualify Democratic Nominee for Attorney General

On October 26, the Republican nominee for Connecticut Attorney General, Martha Dean, brought a lawsuit in state court to disqualify her Democratic opponent, George Jepsen.  See this story.

Earlier this year, the Connecticut Supreme Court had ruled that Susan Bysiewicz, the Democratic Secretary of State who wanted to run for Attorney General this year, does not meet the statutory qualifications to be Attorney General.  Although the Supreme Court issued its conclusion in May, it didn’t explain itself until last week.  When the decision came down, it said that no one is qualified to be Attorney General unless the person has litigated cases in court for ten years.  Dean charges that Jepsen does not qualify because he allegedly does not have ten years of experience trying cases.  He is an attorney who has been “of counsel” for many lawsuits.  That means he advises the attorneys who are actually doing the litigating.

The ballots have already been printed, so Dean is asking that the election for Attorney General be postponed.  There is a third nominee on the ballot for Attorney General, Stephen Fournier.  He is the Green Party nominee.

Arkansas Republican Legislative Candidate Disqualified Less than a Week Before Election

On October 27, a lower Arkansas state court ruled that one Republican nominee for the legislature does not meet the qualifications to hold office.  See this story.  He had been convicted of a misdemeanor in 1984.  His name cannot be removed from the ballot, but signs will be posted at polling places telling voters that votes for him will not be counted.