Former South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Says Independent Candidate for US Senate Likely if Lindsey Graham Loses Republican Primary

According to this article, Dick Harpootlian, a South Carolina attorney and former state chair of the Democratic Party, predicts that if U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham loses the June Republican primary for re-election, there will be a strong independent candidate for U.S. Senate.

Kesha Rogers, Candidate of the LaRouche Organization, Qualifies for Texas Democratic Run-off for U.S. Senate

Texas held the nation’s first primary on March 4. In the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate, Kesha Rogers placed second. Because no one got as much as 50%, a run-off primary will be held on May 27.

Rogers is the candidate backed by Lyndon LaRouche’s organization. See this story about her, written before the results were known. The preliminary Democratic primary results for U.S. Senate are: David Alameel 47.06%, Rogers 21.72%, Maxey Marie Scherr 17.69%, Harry Kim 8.93%, Michael Fjetland 4.57%.

The Texas primary for both major parties had low turnout. Texas had 13,445,285 registered voters as of November 2013. Although not all the 2014 primary returns have been counted, so far the total vote cast for Governor in the Republican primary is 1,333,010, and the total vote cast for Governor in the Democratic primary is 546,480. By contrast, in 2010, there were 1,484,542 votes in the Republican gubernatorial primary and 680,548 in the Democratic gubernatorial primary.

The low turnout is good news for the 1787 Party, which hopes to petition for a place on the November ballot. Voters who voted in the primary cannot sign for a new party or an independent candidate. Texas is the only state which doesn’t let voters sign for an independent or a new party if the voter voted in the primary.

Opponents of North Carolina Voting Restrictions Win Procedural Order for State to Produce More Internal Documents

On March 3, a U.S. District Court Magistrate ruled that opponents of North Carolina’s 2013 voting restrictions must reveal internal government messages for the period August 12, 2013, to the present, that were between the Governor’s Office, the State Board of Elections, and legislators. The order came in the combined lawsuits filed by the NAACP, the League of Women Voters, and the U.S. Department of Justice, seeking to overturn 2013 changes in the voting process. Specifically, the plaintiffs are challenging the reduction in early voting days, the loss of same-day voter registration, and the elimination of out-of-precinct provisional voting.

The state argued that the messages between these branches of state government for the period after August 12, 2013, are irrelevant to the lawsuit, because the bill that made those election law changes (HB 589) had been signed that day. The state had already agreed to reveal such messages made prior to August 12, 2013. But the court ruled that the messages for the period after the bill was signed might be just as relevant to the lawsuit as the earlier messages.

The reason the internal government messages are relevant to the lawsuit is that the plaintiffs are trying to show that the 2013 changes were motivated by a desire to discriminate against certain kinds of voters. The lawsuit argues that the changes violate the federal Voting Rights Act, and the 14th amendment. The lawsuit is North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v McCrory, middle district, 1:13cv-658. See this story.

Utah Bill to Hold Presidential Primary Earlier than Any Other State

On March 4, the Utah House Committee on Political Subdivisions passed HB 410. This bill, introduced by Representative Jon Cox (R-Ephraim) would instruct the Lieutenant Governor (who functions as the head of Utah election administration) to set the date of the presidential primary earlier than any other state’s presidential primary or caucus.

The bill also permits the presidential primary to be conducted as an on-line primary. This would be cheaper than an ordinary public election, and also provide for flexibility when the state sets the date. New Hampshire is famous for not setting the date of its presidential primary until shortly before the actual date of the primary, and has a similar law, mandating that it hold the first primary. Thanks to Josh Putnam of FrontloadingHQ for this news.