On September 17, the Kentucky Libertarian Party won a lawsuit over the right to nominate someone, even if that person is a registered member of another political party. The Jefferson Circuit Court ruled that Edward Martin should be on the November ballot as the Libertarian nominee for U.S. House, 3rd district, even though he is a registered Republican. Cummings v Martin, 08-CI-08751.
The Kentucky Libertarian Party is not a ballot-qualified party, so it placed Martin on the ballot by petition. Kentucky election law says that an independent candidate must not be a registered member of a qualified party. The Secretary of State placed Martin on the ballot, but a Republican Party official sued to remove Martin, on the grounds that if he were an independent candidate, he would not be permitted to be on the ballot. However, the judge ruled that a Libertarian Party nominee is not an “independent candidate”, even though the procedures for ballot access in Kentucky for independent candidates, and the candidates of unqualified parties, are the same (except that, of course, the nominee of an unqualified party may have his party label put on the ballot next to his or her name).
A key fact was that Kentucky keeps track of registrations of certain unqualified parties, including the Libertarian Party. Another fact, noted by the decision, is that the Libertarian Party is a bona fide political party, even if it isn’t a qualified party in Kentucky. The decision says, “Mr. Martin’s use of the Libertarian Party label cannot be fairly construed as some sort of sham designation to mask his otherwise ‘independent’ status. The party has a platform adopted at a national convention in May; it has a presidential candidate, Bob Barr; and it has been in existence since 1971. It has a coherent political philosophy based on the rights of the individual and limited government. While it does not appear any member of the current Congress is a Libertarian, members of the party have won election as, and discharge the duties of, a number of public offices in a number of states.”
Martin became a registered Republican in order to vote for Ron Paul earlier this year in the presidential primary. He represented himself in court even though he is not an attorney. It is possible there will be an appeal.
Something good from Kentucky!
Wow! A victory!
This is good news.
The American Ruse &
when Black Friday comes.
Honesty or lies?
Compassion or greed?
Intelligence or narrow-minded?
Guts, or go along to get along?
Ralph Nader
Cynthia McKinney
Ron Paul
Mike Gravel
Dennis Kucinich
Jesse Ventura
H. Ross Perot
President Carter
JFK RFK MLK Malcolm
Still, with the proper number and locale of signatures, Anti Arab Mental Patient should have been left on as an ‘Independent’ for U. S. Senate.
Remember, the Democans and Republicrats never make a mistake: John Kennedy, LBJ, Nixon, Agnew, Eagleton, Ford, Carter, Mondale, Rockefeller, Reagan, any one named Bush League, any one named Clinton, Gore [can still be found collecting bribes at Buddist Temple[s] ], Next Ambassdor to Israel Lieberman, Kerry, Edwards, Palin, Insane McCain…..
The republicans are trying anything and everything to steal this election. See http://www.republicantricks.com
This is a great decision. I’d like to meet the judge. Very wise! We need more of these.
Judges make decisions after hearing two sides. Whatever Martin said in resonse to the Judge is what convinced the Judge to rule in his favor. Nice job, Mr Martin, keep fighting!
Vote for Bruce to Ditch Mitch.
DonaldRLake, There are only 2 candidates for US Senate in Kentucky; a D and an R. There were 2 options; Libertarian or none. The LPKY executive committee chose “none”.