Missouri Supreme Court Unanimously Puts Redistricting Referendum on November Ballot and Reinstates Old Pre-Gerrymander District Lines

On September 3, the Missouri Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the referendum petition filed months ago must go on to the November ballot. The referendum concerns U.S. House district boundaries. When the legislature redrew the U.S. House districts earlier last year, opponents of the new lines mounted a referendum petition. But then the Secretary of State refused to put it on the ballot, arguing that the referendum process can’t be used to alter federal election rules. The State Supreme Court has reversed that decision. Furthermore, this means that the old districts will not be used until after the voters vote on the issue.

The Secretary of State says he will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the State Supreme Court. Here is the State Supreme Court opinion. Harris v Hoskins, SC101806.

Article in The Downballot Describes Campaign in Massachusetts Around Top-Two Initiative

Jeff Singer and David Nir of The Downballot here describe the Massachusetts campaign for and against Question Three, the top-two initiative.

As is normal for articles, nothing is said about how the initiative makes it far more difficult for a minor party to be ballot-qualified. The relatively easy way currently for a party to be ballot-qualified is by polling 3% for any statewide race. It is fairly easy for a minor party to meet this test in midteerm years, when Auditor, Treasurer, and Secretary of State are on the ballot. Most voters don’t care very much who wins for those offices, and therefore voters are generous to third party candidates in those races. But if the initiative passes, parties won’t have nominees (except for president) so that option would be gone.