Transcript of Oral Argument in U.S. Supreme Court on Judicial Campaign Contributions and Justice

On March 3, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Capterton v Massey, the interesting case over whether the U.S. Constitution protects people who are in court, and their opponents have contributed very large amounts of money to the campaigns of the judges who are hearing the case. Here is the transcript. The decision, when it is rendered, may affect Ralph Nader’s case, and the Pennsylvania Green Party’s case, against the large fees that they must pay to the people who challenged their petitions.


Comments

Transcript of Oral Argument in U.S. Supreme Court on Judicial Campaign Contributions and Justice — No Comments

  1. The Judge gets $3 Million from a party in a law suit and he’s not going to be influenced? Just like the crooked Judge on the Pennsylvania Court INFLUENCED by the crooked Law firm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.