Green and Constitution Parties Submit Evidence in Georgia Ballot Access Case

The Green Party and the Constitution Party are preparing for a trial in their Georgia ballot access case, which charges that presidential ballot access is too difficult in Georgia for minor parties and independent candidates. On September 11 evidence was filed showing that there have been 401 instances in U.S. history when a state prepared a government-printed ballot in a presidential election, and required more than 5,000 signatures. The evidence shows that in all 401 instances, that state did not ever have more than six candidates meeting that requirement. Furthermore, in the only four instances when six petitions succeeded, all those instances were in Illinois, a state that assumes any petition is valid (even if it has only one signature on it) unless that petition is challenged. When the Illinois instances are taken out, there is no instance when more than five petitions succeeded.

This shows that states that require more than 5,000 signatures simply don’t need to worry about crowded general election ballots. The evidence also shows that Georgia doesn’t require any petitions at all, nor any fee, for presidential primary candidates, if the party leaders approve of them. The evidence shows that in 2012, nine Republicans were on the presidential primary ballot and a majority of them got less than one-fourth of 1% of the vote, yet there is no evidence that having as many as nine candidates on the Republican primary ballot injured anyone, and instead having nine candidates enhanced the voting freedom of Georgia Republican primary voters.

Georgia requires approximately 50,000 signatures for an independent presidential candidate, or the nominee of an unqualified party, to get on the ballot. Each petition sheet must be notarized. No Georgia presidential petition has succeeded in 15 years.


Comments

Green and Constitution Parties Submit Evidence in Georgia Ballot Access Case — 6 Comments

  1. SCOTUS has been BRAIN DEAD about EQUAL ballot access requirements since 1968 — a mere 32+15 = 47 LONG years.

    1. Every election is NEW.
    2. Separate is NOT equal. Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954.

    Heaven help the USA — from its IGNORANT SCOTUS morons.
    — The current SCOTUS MORONS are even worse than the MORONS who produced Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857
    — which produced Civil WAR I in 1861.

  2. Scotus did some good things more recently than 1968. Minor parties or independent candidates won cases in the US Supreme Court in 1972, 1974, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1983, and 1992. And that doesn’t count the cases striking down restrictions on who can petition, nor the US Term Limits case that said states can’t add to the constitutional qualifications for federal office.

  3. When 3rd party and Independent petition advocates start to realize that these states are not about to change their requirements as long as the Courts says the current law is constitutional. It is time we begin a new approach. Let us start asking (for presidential candidates) filing fees of no more then $5000 provided the candidate has been nominated by a recognized political party. This would deter frivolous candidates who just happened to have $5000 to qualify to see how many votes they can win. But for the serious candidate, being nominated by a recognized party, would convince the legislatures that there would be no more than 5 or 6 such candidates.

  4. How many super BAD rotted SCOTUS JUNK opinions since 1968 regarding third parties and independents ???
    scores, hundreds, thousands ??? — including denial of certs and summary orders.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.