Virginia Lawsuit Over Republican Presidential Primary to be Heard Wednesday, January 13

U.S. District Court Judge M. Hannah Louck has expedited the case Parson v Alcorn. This is the case over whether the Virginia State Board of Elections should comply with the Republican Party’s request that voters who ask for a Republican presidential primary ballot in March 1 must sign a statement that says the signer is a Republican. The statement says, “My signature below indicates that I am a Republican.”

Here is a newspaper editorial in opposition to the sign-in statement. In my opinion, the newspaper’s use of the word “oath” is not good language usage. “Oath” is defined as “a formal calling upon God or a god to witness to the truth of what one says, or to witness that one sincerely intends to do what one says.”

The lawsuit, filed by three voters, is a strong one. The Virginia open primary has already been upheld in the past, on the grounds that Virginia parties are free to decide for themselves if they want a government-administered primary or if they would rather nominate at their own expense by convention or caucus. The Virginia Republican Party considered using a caucus this year instead of a presidential primary, but decided to keep the primary.


Comments

Virginia Lawsuit Over Republican Presidential Primary to be Heard Wednesday, January 13 — 1 Comment

  1. The New Age D/R top oligarchs LOVE their EVIL last second election law machinations to rig more and more stuff.

    The SCOTUS robot party hacks go along with the nonstop UNEQUAL ballot access stuff.

    One result — the powermad monarchy demagogue stuff — esp by Trump, Clinton and Sanders.
    TOTAL danger — think 1860 times about 10,000.

    P.R. and nonpartisan App. V. — to END all of the EVIL rot since 1776.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.