Washington Post Carries Op-Ed Criticizing U.S. Election Laws and Practices that Bolster Republican and Democratic Parties Against Others

Peter Ackerman and Larry Diamond have this op-ed in the Washington Post. It condemns U.S. election laws and practices that make it difficult for new parties and independent candidates to compete against the Republican and Democratic Parties. Peter Ackerman was a leader of Americans Elect 2010-2012. Larry Diamond is a scholar at the Hoover Institute.


Comments

Washington Post Carries Op-Ed Criticizing U.S. Election Laws and Practices that Bolster Republican and Democratic Parties Against Others — 4 Comments

  1. Believe it or not, all election ate biased unless they use pure proportional representation.

    Even Libertarian county mertings of ten people or Green Party meetings with five people.

    The problem is simply plurality elections when small or large amounts of data is used.

  2. Believe it or not, all election are biased unless they use pure proportional representation.

    Even Libertarian county meetings of ten people or Green Party meetings with five people.

    The problem is simply plurality elections, when small or large amounts of data is used.

  3. Plurality elections = all single-winner elections (including elections using IRV) and all multi-winner elections which don’t use ranked choice voting.

    Pure proportional representation = multi-winner elections which use ranked choice voting.

  4. I have to say I’m done reading this site because of these ridiculously clueless posts by James.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.