According to this story, google searches involving “write-in” have been very high recently. The story says a large share of them involve “write-in Bernie Sanders.”
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
According to this story, google searches involving “write-in” have been very high recently. The story says a large share of them involve “write-in Bernie Sanders.”
Google does not use pure proportional representation for the company or election searches. Their ads are ranked based on the amount you pay them, not on an algorithm which guarantees fair elections.
See how they changed their name from http://www.backrub.com in 1997 after being inspired by my logo joogle (James Orlando Ogle = joogle@cruzio.com) That’s because they the search engine was not successful as backrub.com and they wanted to “juice”.
http://usparliament.org/how-google-got-its-name.php
The juice is the new unity phenomena that’s generated by pure proportional representation (PR). PR provides the foundation for teamwork and cooperation in politics as a peaceful decision-making alternative to force and violence. Nobody has it as good as the United Coalition of Candidates (UCC):
http://international-parliament.org/ucc.html
I can verify that. The vast majority of people coming into my website are coming into the page on how to do a write-in vote. My page counter stats tell me that they are coming in from several search sites so it’s not just Google.
James are you Demo Rep? Because you’re both delusional.
I support anyone using their vote to speak to their concerns as they see fit. But I do hope all “write-inners” find out, before they cast those votes, whether or not their write-in votes for their preferred candidates will be counted.
Demo Rep is not Mr. Ogle and vice-versa.
P.R. and nonpartisan App.V. — regardless of the many delusional folks who think that the U.S.A. has ANY *democratic* small d regimes — when they are ALL gerrymander oligarchies — since 1776.