National Public Radio has this interview with Evan McMullin, who ran for president as an independent last year. At the end, he says he will probably run for some office in 2018. He implies that would be as an independent candidate.
National Public Radio has this interview with Evan McMullin, who ran for president as an independent last year. At the end, he says he will probably run for some office in 2018. He implies that would be as an independent candidate.
I predicted that he would do this. The people who recruited him to run for President likely made promises to him, and they owe him favors, and now it is time for him to collect.
McMuffin should quit whilst he’s ahead. His schtick of being “not Trump” can only carry him so far.
Commentary by IP Vote Counting Minister James Ogle [Republican]
The First International Parliament (IP) vote totals
oversaw a mathematical sweep on many leadership posts
in almost every political party/category and independents.
The largest category, “Info. Not Avail.”, sees two
IP Senators take the two top spots, and was also
reduced from 229 MIPs to 176 MIPs for the five-year
session.
#1 Senator Laura Frustaci [Info. Not Avail.] Italy and
#2 Senator Theresa F. H. Soliman [Info. Not Avail.]
Egypt, rose to the top spots from former #1
Agostinho Antonio FONA [Info. Not Avail.] Guinea
Bissau, and #2 Gravit Khandelwal [Info. Not Avail.]
Nigeria, in the largest “Info. Not Avail.” group.
“Parties with One Seat”, one of the dynamic single-
member partisans, shrank from 83 MIPs to 69 MIPs,
is the second largest group, but many good names
are only on the team as lower-ranked names as back-ups.
Independents surprising growth rose from 36 MIPs
to 57 MIPs in the “First International Parliament”
and retained the third largest group of the 556 MIPs.
The Humanitarian Party, became the “Humanitarian
Organization Party”, as Senator Evelyn Ermisch
[Humanitarian Organization] Germany took top
spot and that caused the party to adopt her
wording, as top-ranked name is “leader”
under the definitions in the IP guidelines.
A fresh change at 5th and 6th-largest, as the new
Global Peace Party and New World Party take
over fifth and sixth-biggest political party
groupings from the World Democratic and
Republican Parties.
Everyone please study where your name was elected.
The Vote Counting Ministry will happily serve
your requests and move your name to “seat” with
any group you wish, and with any word(s) by your
name that you declare.
Many groups are having precedents. For example,
MIPs self-categorized as the Parliamento Mondiale,
Partido Popular Mundial, World and World Enlightenment
have all been grouped with the New World Party,
as per decision by the Vote Counting Ministry.
See the following information which may contain your
name, party/category, nation (or “Earth”) and email
address (or “No known email”).
Please help the Vote Counting Ministry become aware of
any needed/wanted corrections for the best accuracy.
For example, if you want changes to your email address(es),
one added, or one removed, there are at least two different
email lists (one is for the monthly bulletin and this email
is the new “556 MIPs Email List”. Please be as
detailed as possible when specifying which email list(s)
you would like your email added and/or removed.
The Vote Counting Ministry is building a contact
list of members and this email message is the
example of members’ email addresses.
Thanks very much to everyone, especially the
fifty-six IP Senators.
Also, there are more than 135 consecutively
ranked names as back-ups, so whenever a resignation
occurs the top-ranked name as back-up is
automatically elected.
Many good names were not elected and we hope
that they will consider keeping involved
by participating in another capacity.
New sign-ups are automatically to a Cabinet Ministry,
and they will be added to the 31st-ranked
Cabinet Ministry, the Peace and Progress Ministry,
as we move down the Cabinet and continue to rejuvenate
the second half of the sixty Cabinet Ministries:
http://international-parliament.org/cabinet.html
The Cabinet Ministries are like the General
Assembly, but a smaller scale, so the
Ministries are a good place for new members
to practice.
We at the IP Vote Counting Ministry really
do appreciate your interest and participation.
We hope that you enjoy the pure proportional
representation (PR).
Respectfully,
Vote Counting Minister James Ogle [Republican]
First International Parliament
http://international-parliament.org/about.html
How about a mere about 5 billion adult ministers in the IP ??? —
One vote elects each of them ???
“People anxious to be deceived are easy dupes.” – Grand Duke Alexander of Russia 1932
When we look at supply and demand, the 1000-member International Parliament offers very smooth math for the world’s population and 500 free members combined with 500 Senators (donation required) offers balance between free and monetised participation.
With 1000 open seats the threshold is a low 1/10ths of one percent (plus one vote), or .00999% (plus one vote.
Take the total Earth population, divide it by 1000, and the representative democratic entity’s mathematics are simple.
Because we are new, we are small, and the ceiling of 1000 was set by participation levels.
We’re dynamic, with the ability to make incremental improvements by perpetual “votes of confidence”.
The team psychology is possible only by preventing single-winner elections which attract conceits.
One thousand names elected to the team assure the unity phenomena of pure proportional representation (PR) which is sweeping the Earth.
The ID verification of the participants along with all marked eballots posted for transparency gives the confidence to the elected members that the perfect math of pure proportional representation is being followed to perfection.
These and other innovations have kept our group and the information generated the democratic legitimacy needed for accomplishing more advances while the unified team continues to evolve.
We feature candidates for public office year after year working for important goals: equal time, equal treatment and free speech.
Nobody has it as good as the First International Parliament.