U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Delay Trial in Pennsylvania Gerrymandering Case

On November 3, Justice Samuel Alito refused a request by Pennsylvania state officials to delay a trial in League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. That case, filed in Commonwealth Court, seeks a ruling that Pennsylvania’s U.S. House district boundaries are an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The state government wanted to suspend the trial that is set for December. The state government said in case the U.S. Supreme Court later rules in the Wisconsin case that partisan gerrymandering is constitutional, the trial would be a waste of time.

See this story. Because Justice Alito refused to stop the Pennsylvania trial, it will proceed next month.


Comments

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Delay Trial in Pennsylvania Gerrymandering Case — 1 Comment

  1. 1/2 or less votes x 1/2 rigged pack/crack gerrymander areas = 1/4 or less CONTROL = OLIGARCHY. —

    tending always to monarchy — ie KILLERS in control — Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, etc.

    Since 1776-1789 in the USA.

    PR and AppV

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.