North Carolina Democratic Party Files Final Brief in Lawsuit Over Whether Eliminating Judicial Primaries Violates Constitution

On January 17, the North Carolina Democratic Party filed this final brief in North Carolina Democratic Party v Berger, m.d., 1:17cv-1113. The issue is whether the state violated the U.S. Constitution when it abolished judicial primaries for 2018 only. North Carolina judicial elections are partisan, and party labels appear on the ballot. But with no primaries, there is no state-sanctioned method for any party to choose its nominees.


Comments

North Carolina Democratic Party Files Final Brief in Lawsuit Over Whether Eliminating Judicial Primaries Violates Constitution — 4 Comments

  1. NO primaries.

    NONPARTISAN exec/judic officer elections using AppV – pending Condorcet.

  2. By a NC LAW the judges had partisan elections.

    Such mere law was repealed and now has NON-partisan elections for the judges.
    —-

    The Donkey brief is above average lunatic — claims that judicial offices MUST BE partisan.

    IE – so-called *logic* — ALL elective offices — legislative, executive, judicial (USA, State, Local) — must be partisan — so that party hack gangster factions can choose candidates

    — TOTAL 1st Amdt PERVERSION — going back to 1968 — Williams v Rhodes.

    Stay tuned in this case.

    One more mess created by the SCOTUS party hack MORONS.

  3. @DR, North Carolina had partisan election of judges, then switched to non-partisan elections, and has switched back to partisan elections, but has now eliminated the primary.

  4. JR —

    I stand corrected in part.

    Need a super-computer updated each micro-second to keep track of the HACK machinations.

    PR and AppV — to END the rule of the HACK gangsters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.