Michael R. Strain, a Bloomberg View writer, here suggests that the U.S. would be better off with a multi-party system, combined with an end to a fixed term for the chief executive.
Ballot Access News
Edited By Richard Winger
Michael R. Strain, a Bloomberg View writer, here suggests that the U.S. would be better off with a multi-party system, combined with an end to a fixed term for the chief executive.
Some MORONS never heard about the F-A-T-A-L *parliamentary* systems in England, France and Germany in 1914 — producing World WAR 1 — about 30,000,000 DEAD worldwide and in the 1930s — producing World War 2 in Europe in 1939-1945 — about 80,000,000 DEAD worldwide.
—
PR and AppV
TOTAL Separation of Powers
Demo Rep… WW 1 was about imperialism and the banking regime working their way into the government. It’s the reason we have the IRS and Federal Reserve, and was the creation of the petrodollar. And also the cause of modern terrorism (they broke up the Ottoman Empire), particularly in France and Britain.
Sorry – the FORM/structure of each regime is about 100 percent predictive of what the regime does or does NOT do.
REAL Democracy vs monarchy/oligarchy — for 6,000 plus years
See the book — Outline of History ed by H.G. Wells
esp. the worse and worse arrogant power madness in the Germany regime from 1871 (Defeat of Napoleon III regime) to 1914
— one more killer created — Hitler 1889-1914 — age 25 when WW 1 started — magically survived 4 plus years on the Western Front – age 29 plus.
See the cable TV series — Apocalypse World War I
GOOD – Some monarch regimes wiped out –
Germany, Austro-Hungary, Ottoman, Russia
BAD – replacement regimes even worse / conspiratorial.
Latter 2 – still rotted.
Major weakness in British and French empire regimes.
Latter 2 – now 4th rate powers — almost in left/right civil war status.
Lots of Deja Vu — all over again BAD stuff.
—
PR and AppV
Sigh. One step forward and two steps back. We would be better of with a multi-party system but a parliament would be a disaster. Our system with its separation of powers doctrine is why a multi-party system is ideal for us. Switching to a parliament would be throwing away that advantage.
Gee – what type of regime did the Brits have in 1775-1783 during the American Revolutionary War ???
— producing such things in the USA such as —
the 1776 DOI, the 1776-1787 State Consts, the 1777 Art. Confed., the 1783 USA-Brit Peace Treaty, the 1787 NW Ordinance and even the 1787 USA Const.
Brits – still a 1066 DARK AGE regime with NO written const.