Ninth Circuit Sets Briefing Schedule for California Independent Presidential Ballot Access Case

The Ninth Circuit has issued a briefing schedule in De La Fuente v Padilla, 17-56668. This is the case that challenges the California independent presidential petition requirement, which is 2020 will probably be approximately 200,000 valid signatures. Every other state has some means for a presidential candidate running outside the major parties to get on the ballot with support from fewer than 50,000 people. Yet the U.S. District Court had upheld the law last year. No one has successfully completed the California independent presidential petition since 1992. The U.S. District Court upheld the law partly because it felt that the alternate means to get a new party on the ballot are easy enough. But that was a mistake for two reasons. First, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Storer v Brown in 1974 that the independent candidate and political party approaches are entirely different, and states must have adequate procedures for both. Furthermore, the California procedure for a new party is also very difficult. No group has successfully qualified with a registration drive since 1995.


Comments

Ninth Circuit Sets Briefing Schedule for California Independent Presidential Ballot Access Case — 4 Comments

  1. Does De La Fuente have a lawyer with ANY brains — or just one more business as usual MORON lawyer ???

    1. Every election is NEW.

    2. Separate is NOT equal.

    3. EQUAL ballot access tests for ALL candidates for the SAME office in the SAME area.

    NONSTOP MORON lawyers doing ballot access cases since Williams v Rhodes 1968.

  2. California should use Top 2 to elect presidential electors, one per congressional district, and one form pairs of SBOE districts. Only 40 signatures would be needed. Instead of a party preference, candidates could give a presidential candidate preference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *