Republican National Committee and California Republican Party File Lawsuit Against New California Ballot Access Restriction

On August 6, the National Republican Committee, the California Republican Party, and three Republican voters filed a federal lawsuit against the new California law that keeps presidential primary candidates off the ballot unless they reveal their income tax returns for the last five years. Melendez v Newsom, e.d., 2:19cv-706.

One of the plaintiffs was a delegate to the Republican national convention in 2016 and hopes to be a delegate in 2020. One of the other plaintiffs also hopes to be a delegate to the 2020 national convention. The lead plaintiff, Melissa Melendez, is a California state legislator. The case has not yet been assigned to a judge. Here is the Complaint.

There are now at least five lawsuits in federal court against the new California law, but no lawsuit has been filed that mentions the State Constitution, which clearly prohibits the California law from being upheld. The California Constitution says that the “recognized” candidates will go on the presidential primary ballots.

As far as is known, this is the first time the Republican Party in any state has ever filed a challenge to a presidential ballot access restriction, since 1916, when the Louisiana Republican Party filed a lawsuit so as to enable its presidential nominee, Charles Evans Hughes, to appear on the November ballot. The Louisiana Republican Party had lost its status as a qualified party in Louisiana in 1912 and it was unable to complete the petition to qualify its presidential nominee in 1916, which required 1,000 signatures of voters who were not registered in any party.


Comments

Republican National Committee and California Republican Party File Lawsuit Against New California Ballot Access Restriction — 3 Comments

  1. ALL USA/FEDERAL CASES ???

    — IE WOULD ALSO HAVE TO FILE IN STATE COURTS ???

    BUT AGAIN – *RECOGNIZED* = VOID FOR VAGUENESS

  2. Many states say candidates in presidential primaries are those that are recognized by the mass media, and almost all of those laws have been upheld against claims that “recognized” is too vague. The only one that was ever struck down was Kentucky’s law, in a case filed by Richard Kay, an obscure candidate for the Democratic nomination in 1980. Kay v Ehrler.

  3. THE CURRENT CA CHAOS WILL BE CLEANED UP BY SCOTUS HACKS

    I-F THEY WANT TO AVOID CIVIL WAR II.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.