North Carolina Parties Tell State Board of Elections Which Presidential Candidates to List on Primary Ballots

The North Carolina deadline for qualified parties to tell the state which presidential candidates to list on primary ballots has passed. However, the State Board of Elections has the power to add the names of any presidential candidates who weren’t already listed by their party, so the list is not yet complete. Also anyone who submits 10,000 signatures of party members can be added.

The Republican Party submitted only Donald J. Trump.

The Democratic Party submitted 15 names: Michael Bennet, Joseph R. Biden, Michael R. Bloomberg, Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Julian Castro, John K. Delaney, Tulsi Gabbard, Amy Klobuchar, Deral Patrick, Bernie Sanders, Tom Steyer, Elizabeth Warren, Marianne Williamson, and Andrew Yang.

The Libertarian Party submitted 16 names: Max Abramson, Ken Armstrong, Dan Taxation is Theft Behrman, Kenneth Blevins, Souraya Faas, Erik Gerhardt, Jedidiah Hill, Jacob Hornberger, Jo Jorgenson, Adam Kokesh, John McAfee, James Ogle, Steve Richey, Kim Ruff, Vermin Supreme, and Arvin Vohra.

The Green Party submitted only Howie Hawkins.

The Constitution Party submitted Don Blankenship and Charles Kraut. Thanks to Donald Triplett for this news.


Comments

North Carolina Parties Tell State Board of Elections Which Presidential Candidates to List on Primary Ballots — 10 Comments

  1. How many undercover/bogus Elephants in the LP list ???

    ie the types the LP has run for Prez in recent cycles ???

  2. Barring a petitioning break-through (for Rs) or a petitioning miracle (for the Greens), their ballots will be Trump vs No Preference and Hawkins vs No Preference right? (back in 2012, the NC Dem primary ballot was Obama vs No Preference)

  3. Men, we aren’t doing a good job, the male/female ratio for ballot qualification is 13 to 3, so 23% of the 16 names submitted to North Carolina election primary names are male names.

    Thirteen Male Presidential Candidates

    Max Abramson,
    Ken Armstrong,
    Dan Taxation is Theft Behrman,
    Kenneth Blevins,
    Erik Gerhardt,
    Jedidiah Hill,
    Jacob Hornberger,
    Adam Kokesh,
    John McAfee,
    James Ogle,
    Steve Richey,
    Vermin Supreme,
    Arvin Vohra

    Three Female US Presidential Candidates

    Souraya Faas,
    Jo Jorgenson,
    Kim Ruff
    * * *

    The United Coalition USA plan will be for limited voting on March 3rd 2020 and we need to start getting the word out now.

    The only way to bring the three-party system (or the 539-party system) is limited voting where every voter gets only one vote in a multiple winner election district.

    By using plurality voting in the March 3rd election, we can bring a primitive form of the three-party system by asking males to vote for female names and by also asking females to vote for a male name.

    Our team asks 100% of all men please vote for a female name and 100% of all women please vote for a male name as the winning strategy in 2020 by demonstrating teamwork with those not like us so to attract votes.

    Limited voting is one vote per voter in a two-winner election district, so the top two names would be considered Prez/VP under limited voting in a primitive plurality voting system which uses “Xs” and not numerals.

    Two Females Might Win

    There might be a “male-split-vote problem” since too many male names might bring two female names wins as the two top vote-getters.

    Fortunately, the United Coalition USA is bringing ranked choice voting (RCV) and the single transferable vote (STV) to the pure proportional representation (PPR) Electoral College where

    Our team might be able to mitigate the male-split-vote problem by bringing the new PPR Electoral College on Earth Day 2020.

    Let me be clear, the odds are against us, plurality voting will bring the foul voting system of a two-party Presidential election and the all-male factions using approval and plurality voting within the national Libertarian Party is already trying to snuff us out. So we must try even harder to demonstrate limited voting in 2020.

    Please be sure to use limited voting in all straw polls.

    Our friends in the North Carolina Libertarian Party, please use the correct math on any straw polls. After the poll mail a copy of all the good marked paper ballots (and all “spoiled” paper ballots that were marked incorrectly) to the Secretary’s office here in Pacific Grove California.

    All US voters and all South Carolina voters may cooperate by using the paper ballot for free, now through November 2020, we need to get this done and the window is closing fast.

    Men, we have a shortage of female Electors in the LP because of the 2016 Johnson/Weld campaign and so bring more female voters from all parties and independents to be part of the plan by writing in the name on the paper ballot linked below.

    There are no restrictions for Electors in the US Constitution against non-dues payers being Electors, the Electors are not required to travel to Austin, California or anywhere and the US Constitution doesn’t require Electors for the Libertarian Party to be registered Libertarian Party

    No other way to end the two-party system but to bring more female Electors from outside. Look at the others parties’ Electoral Colleges to find female names, or bring any close dependable female or relative as Elector by using the correct paper ballot for the PPR Electoral College.

    The mailing address for mailing the original stack or copies of the marked paper ballots is printed near the bottom of the paper ballot:

    http://www.allpartysystem.com/e-aps-13.pdf

  4. Thanks again for the opportunity to not be able to get publicity for our campaign for the Green Party nomination for President. NC Greens have learned to rig an election from the Democrats.

    http://www.dlpotus2020.com

    Also ignoring Sedinam 2020, Chad Wilson 2020, Ian Schlakman, David Rolde, and Dario Hunter.

  5. Correction, the percentage of female Libertarian Party Presidential candidates on the North Carolina Libertarian Party primary on March 3rd is actually worse than the original calculations, standing at only 18.75% female names.

  6. @ JO: What an illogical comment. With plurality voting, the females, being fewer, have a better chance, after all.

  7. It’s reverse identity politics where we demonstrate teamwork with those not like us so to attract votes. Not female voting for female, opposite gender ahead of our own, men as VP or Vice Chair.

    New strategy because our team brings teamwork and all parties and independents are working together for the good of the whole.

    Female voters, candidates, Electors, etc. may play music, embarrass us and say anything they wish and we give them pretty much unconditional support unless our backs are against the wall and there is absolutely nothing anyone can do except to vote for a name of our gender.

  8. James Ogle – I strongly encourage you to take the lead in balancing the male:female ratio by either getting a sex change or dropping out. I suggest the former. That way you could also start self-identifying as black and check off another box. And think about becoming a Wiccan, too.

  9. Any left/right handed / brain stuff also ???

    How many quotas / entitlements can there be — even with the RED Donkeys tribe ???

  10. @ JO So, the logical voting system should be approval voting, provided that the voter approves as many male as female candidates. Ranked choice voting won’t work because someone of one gender would be ranked above someone of a different gender, unless they were bisexual or gender neutral.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.