U.S. District Court Strikes Down North Carolina Voter ID Law

On December 31, U.S. District Court Judge Loretta Biggs, an Obama appointee, struck down North Carolina’s law requiring voters at the polls to show certain kinds of ID, or else to vote provisionally. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v Cooper, m.d., 1:18cv-1034.

Here is the 60-page opinion. The case had been filed in 2018.


Comments

U.S. District Court Strikes Down North Carolina Voter ID Law — 8 Comments

  1. Since when is one’s signature in person NOT good enough — for whatever ???

    cash at banks, voting, whatever — when the other side has original sigs.


    ALL absentee secret ballots – Oregon survives — for about 20 years.

  2. A check in effect is provisional.

    If voters were required to sign their ballots, the issue is removed.

  3. How many govt agents/spies/assassins/etc. have multiple IDs and multiple addresses and do multiple votes – to show their fake connection to any local residence ???

  4. JR – NOT quite yet – in this New Age of multiple gerrymander oligarchs and wannabee monarch tyrants.

    How about JR and the other usual suspects on this list ???

    ONE voter-ONE vote

    PR and Appv and TOTSOP

  5. JR –

    What absentee ballot system does NOT require that the voter sign the envelope containing the SECRET ballot ???

  6. What voting scheme does NOT depend on threats and bribes ???

    Is the A-L-L absentee ballot Oregon regime any more or less corrupt/rotted than others regimes

    — esp like CA or TX or MI ???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.