Sixth Circuit Refuses to Stay U.S. District Court Opinion that Gave Ballot Access Relief to Michigan Initiatives

On July 2, the Sixth Circuit issued an order in SawariMedia v Whitmer, 20-1594. This is the case over whether Michigan must give ballot access relief to initiative proponents. The U.S. District Court had said the state must either cut the number of signatures, or give substantially more time to finish the petition. Michigan asked for a stay, but the Sixth Circuit refused the state’s request.

The three judges were Eric L. Clay, a Clinton appointee; Alan E. Norris, a Reagan appointee; and Joan Larsen, a Trump appointee. Larsen was formerly on the Michigan Supreme Court.

The Sixth Circuit has been handling ballot access relief due to the health crisis differently in Michigan and Ohio. The difference is the attitude of the state government toward social distancing. Ohio had made a social-distancing exception for “First Amendment activity”; other states have not done this.


Comments

Sixth Circuit Refuses to Stay U.S. District Court Opinion that Gave Ballot Access Relief to Michigan Initiatives — 1 Comment

  1. More to come re the 1 Amdt – issue pet point.

    NOOO voter issue pet stuff in 1789-1791.

    See olde pre-1776 pets to UK regime by olde colony regimes —
    1765 Stamp Act Congress, 1774 1st Cont Congress, 1776 DOI line — We have petitoned etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.