Ohio Initiative Proponents Will Seek a Ruling in U.S. District Court that Constitution Requires Petitioning Relief During Covid

Posted on by

On May 5, the proponents of several Ohio initiatives filed this brief in U.S. District Court, in Thompson v DeWine, s.d., 2:20cv-2129. This is the case over petitioning relief for initiatives. Although the Sixth Circuit denied injunctive relief (and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to get involved), that doesn’t necessarily mean Ohio’s policy is constitutional. The proponents of the initiatives will seek a ruling that Ohio violates the First Amendment by its policy. Here is the brief.

Comments

Ohio Initiative Proponents Will Seek a Ruling in U.S. District Court that Constitution Requires Petitioning Relief During Covid — 1 Comment

  1. Ongoing attempt to have 1st Amdt apply to all ballot access stuff.

    How many States had ballots in 1789-1791 – for offices and/or issues ???

    What ballot access stuff had problems in 1789-1791 ???

    ALL *rights* texts/amdts in Consts. have some prior historical govt stuff [generally rotted/deadly] connected with them.

    See book — Sources of our Liberties by Richard L. Perry [1959 Am Bar Assn] –
    history of 1-8 USA Const Amdts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.