Texas Senate Passes Peculiar Bill on Primary Dates and Candidacy Deadlines

On April 14, the Texas Senate passed SB 100, by Senator Leticia Van de Putte (D-San Antonio). As amended, the bill leaves the Texas primary in early March. But it moves the runoff primary from the 2nd Tuesday in April, to the 4th Tuesday in May. The motivation for the bill is the federal law that requires overseas absentee ballots to be mailed no later than 45 days before any election. The existing system can’t cope with that requirement, because the existing system has too little time between the primary and the runoff primary.

The bill has some inadvertent effects on various deadlines for candidates. If this bill becomes law, the petition deadline for an independent candidate for any office except President will move from May 14 to June 21. That, of course, is helpful to independent candidates who are not running for President. But, oddly, the petition deadline for an independent presidential candidate would continue to be May 14. This is because, under the existing law and under the bill as well, the petition deadline for independent candidates for office other than President is tied to the date of the runoff primary. But the independent presidential petition is not. It is difficult to believe that any court would uphold the constitutionality of a state law that says independent presidential candidates must submit their petition (which requires 80,778 signatures) by May 14, yet the petition deadline for independent candidates for other statewide office (who need 49,799 signatures) would be 38 days later. The U.S. Supreme Court said in Anderson v Celebrezze said ballot access for presidential candidates who run outside the major parties must be easier than ballot access candidates for other office. If SB 100 passes, Texas will have that completely backwards.

SB 100 also moves the deadline for all non-presidential candidates to file a declaration of candidacy from January 2 of the election year, to the third Monday in December of the year before the election. This deadline even applies to independent candidates (but not presidential independent candidates). If this passes, Texas will be the only state in the nation that requires an independent candidate to file a declaration of candidacy in the odd year before an election year. The only other state that ever required an independent candidate for any office to file anything in the odd year before the election year had been Illinois, which had once required non-presidential independent candidates to file a petition in December of the year before the election. But that deadline was held unconstitutional in 2006 in Lee v Keith, 463 F.3d 763 (7th Circuit).

SB 100 passed the Senate on second reading and third reading on the same day. Normally the Constitution forbids bills to pass without at least one day between second reading and third reading, but a legislative chamber has the authority to waive that rule. Senator Jeff Wentworth (R-San Antonio) objected to passing the bill so speedily. He said if the normal rule were followed, the news of the bill passing second reading would give the public a chance to find any flaws in the bill before the bill passes third reading. Thanks to Jim Riley for the news about HB 100.

Canadian Voters Next Month Have an Average of Five Choices on the Ballot

At the May 2011 Canadian parliamentary election, the average district will have slightly more than 5 candidates on the ballot. Here is a link to an official list of the candidates. There are 308 districts, and 1,587 candidates. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.

Canadian ballot access laws treat all candidates equally. Each candidate needs 100 signatures and a filing fee of $1,000 (Canadian dollars, of course). The ballot access laws do not depend on the candidate’s party or lack of partisan affiliation.

Judge Won't Re-Schedule District of Columbia Special Election, Despite Conflict with Passover

The District of Columbia is holding a special election on Tuesday, April 26, to fill a vacancy in the At-Large City Council seat, and also two seats on the Board of Education. On April 15, a U.S. District Court declined to order the Board of Elections to either move the date of the election to another day, or to extend voting hours from 8 p.m. until 10 p.m. A lawsuit had been filed on April 13, arguing that Orthodox Jews are not able to vote at the polls on election day because April 26 is the last day of Passover. Herzfeld v D.C. Board of Elections, 1:11-cv-721.

Passover ends at 8:40 p.m., so if the hours for voting had been extended until 10 p.m., the problem would have resolved itself. The judge noted that anyone can participate in early voting. Also he said if the lawsuit had been filed as soon as the Board of Elections had set the election date, then he would have ordered an extension of voting hours. See this story.

The election for City Council-at-Large is a partisan election, but because it is a special election, parties don’t choose nominees. The ballot lists six Democrats, one Republican, one Green, and one independent candidate. The Green candidate is Alan Page.

The Oregonian, Oregon's Largest Newspaper, Blasts Bill to Force Independent Party to Change its Name

The April 16 print edition of The Oregonian, the largest newspaper in Oregon, has this editorial, blasting HB 2442. This is the bill that tells the Independent Party, a ballot-qualified party since 2006, that the party must choose a new name.

UPDATE: here is a story in the same newspaper, in which the reporter attempts to find out who is responsible for HB 2442. The bill was introduced by the committee, and no particular legislator is willing to admit suggesting the bill. Thanks to Blair Bobier for that link.

Maine Bill Easing Organizational Requirements for Political Parties Bogs Down

Maine requires a ballot-qualified party to hold at least one municipal caucus in each of the 16 counties of the state, in the spring of each even-numbered year. Independent Maine representative Ben Chipman, who is closely associated with the Green Party, earlier this year introduced LD 142, to change the requirement so that parties are only obliged to hold caucuses within any 12 counties, instead of all 16. The bill passed the Joint Committee on State and Local Government last month, but it has been stalled ever since. This Portland Daily Sun story describes the bill and the trouble that it is having.

Maine is the only state that requires a political party to have organizations within every county. In 1989 the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Eu v San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee that states cannot tell parties how to be organized. Specifically, the co-plaintiff Libertarian Party of California in that case was granted the freedom to organize itself on a regional basis (the party created its own regions), and to be free of a state election law that required organization on a county basis.