Three Lawsuits are Pending Against Various Parts of North Carolina’s Omnibus Election Law Bill

On August 12, the very day North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed HB 589 (the omnibus election law bill), three lawsuits were filed against parts of the bill.

A challenge to the government photo-ID requirements was filed in both federal court and state court. The state court case is filed in Orange County and is Currie v North Carolina. It argues that the new requirements for ID violate the North Carolina Constitution. The federal case is North Carolina NAACP v McCrory, 1:13cv-658, middle district.

A federal lawsuit against the shrinkage in early voting days, greater restrictions on provisional ballots, and the elimination of same-day registration, is League of Women Voters of North Carolina v Howard, 1:13cv-660. This case argues that the new provisions violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and the 14th amendment.

Both federal cases were assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Thomas D. Schroeder, a George W. Bush appointee.


Comments

Three Lawsuits are Pending Against Various Parts of North Carolina’s Omnibus Election Law Bill — No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.