IRV & Single Transferrable Vote Win in All 4 Ballot Measures

All four ballot measures to institute alternative voting systems passed on November 7. Oakland, California, passed IRV for city office by 68%. Minneapolis passed IRV for city office by 65%.

Two more advanced forms seem to have passed narrowly. In Pierce County, Washington (that state’s 2nd most populous county, which contains Tacoma), all partisan county offices will apparently no longer have partisan primaries. Instead, there will be a single election in November, using IRV. Although ballot access will be easy for all candidates, party labels will be restricted to those candidates who had won their party’s nomination by convention, in advance of the election. Pierce County now more closely approximates the systems used by Ireland and the Australia than any other jurisdiction in the U.S. The Pierce County measure was the only one affecting partisan elections. Thanks to Bob Richard for helping make this post more accurate.

Finally, Davis passed advisory measure L (with 55%), which provides for Single Transferrable Vote for multi-winner offices such as City Council-at-large. Like all California elections for city office, Davis uses non-oartisan elections. However, Davis will now apparently share the characteristic of Cambridge, Massachusetts, under which an organized minority of voters can place a candidate on the city council if that minority comprises approximately 25% (in Cambridge the threshold is lower than 25%, because Cambridge elects more members to its city council).


Comments

IRV & Single Transferrable Vote Win in All 4 Ballot Measures — 3 Comments

  1. Two corrections on Davis: (1) this was an advisory vote rather than a binding one, and (2) Davis doesn’t have an elected mayor or any other elected executive offices. The measure only affects city council.

    The council is currently elected at large, so the comparison to Cambridge, MA is appropriate. But a few influential folks want to put district elections on the table along with ranked voting. As a general law city, Davis must now (1) decide on a charter proposal, or (2) ask the legislature for an exception to the existing law governing general law cities, or (3) support legislation allowing ranked voting for all jurisdictions. In all three cases, another vote will be required. Activists in Davis are emphasizing option (1).

  2. A question about Pierce County, WA. Since all offices there are single-seat, wouldn’t a better comparison be to the Australian lower house (rather than Senate) and the Irish presidency (rather than legislature)?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.