Missouri Bill Advances, Would Ease Initiative Petitioning

Missouri SB 569 passed the Senate Finance, Government Organization & Elections Committee on April 15. It makes it easier to qualify initiative petitions. It says that if a registered voter signs an initiative, the signature counts, regardless of any problems involved because the circulator was a person not entitled to be a circulator (Missouri does not permit out-of-state circulators for petitions for new parties).

The philosophy behind this bill is sound, and ought to be embraced by all states. If the signer is entitled to sign a petition, that signature should count, regardless of any characteristics of the circulator. By analogy, votes cast by legally qualified voters ought to count as well, no matter what errors are made by officials at the polling place.

Approximately 10 states don’t even require that petition circulators sign the bottom of the petition, or otherwise identify themselves, and those 10 states seem to have no trouble with that permissive policy.

The Missouri bill makes other changes also, such as legalizing a signature even if the voter signed a petition sheet meant for residents of some other county. However, the petition must clearly indicate the signer’s county of residence. SB 569 is sponsored by Senator Jim Lembke (R-St. Louis). Unfortunately the protections in the bill do not also apply to candidate petitions, or petitions to establish a new party. Thanks to Ken Bush for this news.

Other Missouri bills that affect minor parties, independent candidates, or the initiative process, have not made any headway. They include the bill to delete the requirement that a petition to qualify a minor party must include the party’s presidential elector candidates, and the bill to move the independent candidate petition deadline from July to March, and the bills to outlaw paying initiative circulators on a per signature basis, and bills to lower the number of signatures needed for statewide initiatives.


Comments

Missouri Bill Advances, Would Ease Initiative Petitioning — No Comments

  1. Richard, I believe that the statement “Missouri does not permit out-of-state circulators” is incorrect since Missouri’s state House is considering HB228, which outlaws out-of-state petitioners among other issues.

  2. I should have said that Missouri does not permit out-of-state circulators for new parties and independent candidates. See 115.325. The circulator’s affidavit says, among other things, that the circulator is a resident of Missouri.

  3. Misery: state motto —- “The Show Me State”

    Well, informally, it should be “don’t rock the Duopoly Establishment”! As a teen and twenties [1960s and 1970s] in the mid west I found non Dems and non GOP to be pretty much invisible. And the government, media and Dems/GOP like it that way………

  4. As to the bill which would change the filing date for Indie candidates, the main sponsor has formed a committee to run for a state wide office…….which one you may ask but to be honest, doubt he even knows at this time. It’s term limit time for him. Well imagine he will be seeking Indie support for whatever office he ends up running for…..jeeze……..got to love politics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.