Connecticut House Debates National Popular Vote Plan

The Hartford Courant has this story about the debate in the Connecticut House over the National Popular Vote Plan bill.


Comments

Connecticut House Debates National Popular Vote Plan — No Comments

  1. How did you determine that they were voters? How many expressed no opinion? Why was the wording of the poll question changed after Spring 2008?

  2. These polls are not really good polls. Check out the question? It is written to get a positive response off of the first option before the listener hears the second option. Pressing phone buttons and especially the number “1” is a very bad way to get a real poll. Many people will push “1” just to get the computerized voice off of their phone. These are bogus surveys, but are intelligently being used to alter are election system. Corrupt data!!!

  3. A 5-2 split (72%-28%) for a Connecticut District plan in 2008 would have given the state electoral college vote closer to the actual popular vote (61%-38%) than the state-made winner take all rule (100% – 0%). Why is so important to silence the minority if you would be for all votes counting in a national direct popular election, like presidentialelectionamendment.com?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.