All Briefs Now Filed with U.S. Supreme Court in Petition Privacy Case

On December 16, the last brief was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in Doe v Reed, 09-559, the case over whether governments should release the names and addresses of people who sign petitions. The Court will consider whether the hear this case at its January 8, 2010 conference, although it won’t tell the public what it decided until January 11, 2010.

Here is the Washington state government’s brief, which argues that the names and addresses should be released because they aren’t really private anyway, since some sheets are circulated in public places, so that some people see some of the names in any event. Also it argues that it is necessary to let the names and addresses be public for the benefit of people who wish to contest the Secretary of State’s decision that the petition has enough valid names.

Here is the brief of Washington Families Standing Together, which intervened in the case on the side of the Secretary of State. It argues that the Court shouldn’t take the case because of procedural problems with taking it now.

Here is the response brief of the petition-signers who don’t want their names and addresses released to the public. It belittles the state’s argument that because there is inevitably some exposure of the names and addresses in limited situations, that therefore privacy is not a factor. It points out that when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the 1950’s that states may not force the NAACP to reveal its donor list and its members, in that situation there were already a relatively small number of people (mostly within the NAACP) who would see the list in any event.

Here is the first brief, filed by the proponents of privacy, back on November 7, 2009. This is the brief that opened this round of briefs, set forth what the case is about, and made the initial argument as to why the Court should hear the case. If the Court refuses to hear the case, then the Secretary of State will be free to release the 136,000 names and addresses of the people who signed the Referendum Petition to force a vote on the Washington state civil-unions law.


Comments

All Briefs Now Filed with U.S. Supreme Court in Petition Privacy Case — 1 Comment

  1. Any hot button petitions for —

    repealing the prohibition of bills of attainer ???

    having slavery ???

    taking away ALL rights for members of the ABC XYZ group of persons ???

    etc.

    How many left/right party hack groups are making ENEMY lists of persons on various subjects ???

    See the infamous Prez Nixon enemy lists in 1969-1974 (before his EVIL attempts to subvert the Constitution were exposed and he resigned in total disgrace).

    History note — it took special constitutional language in various State Constitutions to have the SECRET ballot.

    More of the same coming IF the Supremes rule against privacy in petitions ??? Stay tuned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.