On February 5, the California Secretary of State released new registration data, as of January 5, 2010.
The new figures are: Democratic 44.623%, Republican 30.752%, American Independent 2.261%, Green .659%, Libertarian .499%, Peace & Freedom .326%, Reform .140%, independent and miscellaneous 20.740%.
The last figures released were from May 2009. At the time, those percentages were: Democratic 44.553%, Republican 31.047%, American Independent 2.194%, Green .664%, Libertarian .486%, Peace & Freedom .324%, Reform .146%, independent and miscellaneous 20.587%.
To see the numbers, see here. The Reform Party is not ballot-qualified but the state keeps track of its registrations. However, Sacramento County doesn’t report the number of registrants in the Reform Party, so the Reform Party actually has about 900 more registrants than the official figures show.
The number of registered voters declined since May 2009, due to election officials purging the rolls. The only two parties that actually have more registered voters than they did in May 2009 are the American Independent Party and the Libertarian Party.
That American Independent Party sure is a wild card. I think Reform Party operatives need to conduct registration drives where they target AIP supporters.
Since the action of the AIP State Central Committee
of Janauary 13th, 2010. The AIP SCC voted not to allow the Reform Party electors to crossover and vote in the AIP Primary. Thanks needs to go to Elliott Graham for bring up his dispute with Charles Deemer to the AIP SCC, which took Graham’s
view over that of Deemer. Nightingale lost out of
getting crossover RINO’s (Reform In Name Only) in
voting for her in the primary, because of the action of the AIP SCC on Janaury 13, 2010.
Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party
What Reform Party ???????????
No conferences, teleconferences, news letters, blogs, meetings, seminars …………
What Reform Party ?????????
Like the Libs/ Boston Tea Party, Keyes verses Baldwin, the [Anti American Israel First] John Blare verses Rodney [Reasonable Moderate] Martin factions believe in Unity Thru Splintering!
Pingback: Third Party Landscape: Party Registration Figures for California | Independent Political Report
TO: Don Lake
I agree with you about the Reform Party. That is not the point. There is a large number of electors
in the Political Body that calls themselve Reform
at the point of registration. This is who the
hijackers wanted to crossover voting on June 8,
2010. At least it was large numbers on the number
that votes compared to that voting within the AIP
who will vote.
It is a numbers game. In order for Nightingale and
King to win the AIP primary they needed cross over
voters for Nightingale and King. They were looking
at the Reform because of the connect with Pat Buchanan, viz., Jim King, who is trying to hijack
the AIP was a very high contributor to Pat Buchanan
in his bid for President. Back in 2002 – 2004 the
RINO’s took control of the AIP leadership and it
went down hill, placing persons like RINO Rayna
P. Mike-King (who was “Republican Business Woman of the Year” of the NRCC) as so-called “officers”.
The good news is the AIP SCC has prevented the hijackers with a block, viz., no crossover voting
for Nightingale and King.
Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party
The ultra corrupt Mark Seidenberg is one of the hijackers of the American Independent Party since he was involved in the deliberate filing of falsified documents with the Secretary of State office as documented at TheCorruptionOfAlanKeyes.blogspot.com. He is an outright liar. Chairman Jim King is leading the non-corruption faction of the AIP which will annihilate the Robinson/Seidenberg/Noonan corruption faction in the coming elections.
Don J. Grundmann, D.C. Vice-Chairman American Independent Party, California branch of the Constitution Party