The British government says the next Parliamentary election will be May 6, 2010.
Comments
Britain Will Hold Parliamentary Election on May 6 — No Comments
Look for the Conservatives and UKIP to do really well. Here’s hoping the Euroskeptics’ position improves.
Conservatives will almost certainly underperform expectations, I wouldn’t be surprised if we got a hung parliament. I doubt the modernisation losers of the UKIP will win any seats; the fascist BNP might win one or two, though.
P.R. for both houses of the U.K. Parliament — especially if no party hack gets a majority of the gerrymander seats in the gerrymander House of Commons (aka the *hung* parliament above) ???
Thus — possible REAL Democracy into the U.K and Doom for the British monarchy / oligarchy ??? Stay tuned.
Richard,
Could you please keep us informed as to the number of candidates for each district race? Just to compare it to the number of candidates per congressional district in the general elections in the 50 states this November.
How does the British regime manage to get ballots to and from the British troopers on the front lines in Asia fighting the BARBARIANS ???
Juan Jose Nolla, traditionally the main 3 political parties (Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrats) stand in all British mainland seats. Scotland and Wales have a nationalist/separatist parties which add another definite for those areas (Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru respectfully). Typically a smaller party which has representation at councils or European Parliament level will also stand, UKIP the anti-European Union party and the Green Party.
Urban seats can almost always assume that at least one extremely minor party from each extreme of the political spectrum, either a Communist or Socialist leaning candidate, and on the other side either an alternative fiscal conservative party (such as the New Party) or one with Fascist leanings (National Front is pretty dead, the British National Party has effectively replaced it). Added to this, an Independent or two might try and stand depending on the area. Altogether, a lucky seat might have at least 6 candidates, with anything up to 3 or 4 candidates running a close election in extreme conditions. Extreme Rural areas will only expect the main 3, but I think this only accounted for about 5-10 seats out of the entire 646 seats in the 2005 election. My constituency had 5 candidates in 2005, and is expecting that much at least this year and it is fairly rural.
For any clueless folks on this list —
The U.K. House of Commons is THE EVIL source of ALL of the EVIL minority rule gerrymander regimes in the U.S.A. and in some other nations — i.e. Canada and India especially — based on the de facto gerrymander formation of the English House of Commons in the 1200s — a mere 700 plus years of ANTI-Democracy in England.
Cause — the AREA fixation for electing legislators.
Each legislator is the de facto KING/QUEEN of *his/her* realm — aka gerrymander district.
See the growing arrogance of the EVIL party hacks in the U.S.A. — especially in the de facto one party *safe seat* gerrymander districts.
P.R. and A.V. — See some more rational politics in nations with P.R. — Germany, New Zealand, Israel, etc — with P.R. systems about 95 percent accurate.
Look for the Conservatives and UKIP to do really well. Here’s hoping the Euroskeptics’ position improves.
Conservatives will almost certainly underperform expectations, I wouldn’t be surprised if we got a hung parliament. I doubt the modernisation losers of the UKIP will win any seats; the fascist BNP might win one or two, though.
P.R. for both houses of the U.K. Parliament — especially if no party hack gets a majority of the gerrymander seats in the gerrymander House of Commons (aka the *hung* parliament above) ???
Thus — possible REAL Democracy into the U.K and Doom for the British monarchy / oligarchy ??? Stay tuned.
Richard,
Could you please keep us informed as to the number of candidates for each district race? Just to compare it to the number of candidates per congressional district in the general elections in the 50 states this November.
How does the British regime manage to get ballots to and from the British troopers on the front lines in Asia fighting the BARBARIANS ???
Juan Jose Nolla, traditionally the main 3 political parties (Labour, Conservative, Liberal Democrats) stand in all British mainland seats. Scotland and Wales have a nationalist/separatist parties which add another definite for those areas (Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru respectfully). Typically a smaller party which has representation at councils or European Parliament level will also stand, UKIP the anti-European Union party and the Green Party.
Urban seats can almost always assume that at least one extremely minor party from each extreme of the political spectrum, either a Communist or Socialist leaning candidate, and on the other side either an alternative fiscal conservative party (such as the New Party) or one with Fascist leanings (National Front is pretty dead, the British National Party has effectively replaced it). Added to this, an Independent or two might try and stand depending on the area. Altogether, a lucky seat might have at least 6 candidates, with anything up to 3 or 4 candidates running a close election in extreme conditions. Extreme Rural areas will only expect the main 3, but I think this only accounted for about 5-10 seats out of the entire 646 seats in the 2005 election. My constituency had 5 candidates in 2005, and is expecting that much at least this year and it is fairly rural.
For any clueless folks on this list —
The U.K. House of Commons is THE EVIL source of ALL of the EVIL minority rule gerrymander regimes in the U.S.A. and in some other nations — i.e. Canada and India especially — based on the de facto gerrymander formation of the English House of Commons in the 1200s — a mere 700 plus years of ANTI-Democracy in England.
Cause — the AREA fixation for electing legislators.
Each legislator is the de facto KING/QUEEN of *his/her* realm — aka gerrymander district.
See the growing arrogance of the EVIL party hacks in the U.S.A. — especially in the de facto one party *safe seat* gerrymander districts.
P.R. and A.V. — See some more rational politics in nations with P.R. — Germany, New Zealand, Israel, etc — with P.R. systems about 95 percent accurate.