Kansas Residency Requirement for Petitioners Declared Unconstitutional

On August 13, a U.S. District Court Judge in Kansas struck down the law requiring circulators to be residents of Kansas.  Constitution Party of Kansas v Biggs, 10-4043.  This outcome was no surprise, because on July 23, the Attorney General and the attorney for the Constitution Party had filed a joint brief, arguing that the law is unconstitutional.

Kansas is in the 10th circuit, and the 10th circuit had ruled in 2008 that residency requirements for circulators are unconstitutional.  See this story about the lawsuit.  The list of states (in the newspaper story) that ban out-of-state circulators is not accurate.  In some of the states on the list, the ban on out-of-state circulators has already been struck down.

The other half of the lawsuit is not settled yet.  It concerns the state’s ban on voters registering into a party that is not ballot-qualified.  The case law in the 10th circuit on that issue is also good, but Kansas is not willing to concede that point.  The Constitution Party is not ballot-qualified but some Kansas voters would like to register as members of the party.  Similar lawsuits have won in New Jersey, New York, Iowa, Oklahoma, and Colorado.  However, relief in some of these cases has been limited to unqualified parties that do place their nominees on the November ballot.  In Kansas, the Constitution Party has twice placed its presidential nominee on the ballot even while it was not a qualified party.


Comments

Kansas Residency Requirement for Petitioners Declared Unconstitutional — 4 Comments

  1. As usual – each State is a sovereign Nation-State — since 4 July 1776.

    In each such State – (1) Electors-Voters and (2) all others – children, felons, other State citizens, foreign nation folks, outer space folks, etc.

    Way too difficult for the party hack Supremes to detect.

  2. The SouthWest Super-state Parliament Circuit #10
    Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Nevada, Oklahoma and Utah
    http://www.usparliament.org/ss10.htm

    Julian Waters [Cool Moose], Anita Goodman [Pansexual Freedom], Phil DeBlanc [Independent], Daniel Bartels [Bicycle],Vincent Hamm [Democratic], Ralph Bell [Pot], Jeff Verhey [Marijuana], Amy Hanson [Rocker], Dan Kennedy [Republican/Conservative], Tony Dunsworth [Libertarian], Raymond Rael [Hemp], Richard Haley [Info. Not Avail.], Hannah Dixon [Pot], Tom Kness [Info. Not Avail.], Shay Kastner [Pot], Evan Colletti [Pot], The Reverend Q [What’s Happening Now], Earl Bagwell [Green], Erika Wells [Pot], Tokenwhiteguy [Pot], Marc Black [Independent]

  3. Good news. Now if the courts would just declare candidate petitions unconstitutional.

  4. Since nobody else is giving me credit for this, I’m going to take it.

    I was the plaintiff in the case in Oklahoma that overturned the non-out of state requirement. It appears as though Kansas went by the precedent of that decision.

    We lost the original case and then won on appeal. Now it appears we’re winning all over. Thanks to me – America’s #1 Libertarian Petitioner.

    Yeah baby!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.