On September 20, Ralph Nader’s attorney submitted 275 pages of affidavits, from 14 individuals, explaining what the Democratic National Committee and some of its allies did to Nader’s 2004 presidential campaign. The evidence includes affidavits from some of his circulators, who were subject to pressure to stop them from working. The evidence is for the case now pending state court in Maine. The volume of this evidence is sufficiently lengthy that the judge is postponing the hearing until November 5, to give the other side a chance to digest that evidence. The evidence focuses on what happened in 2004 in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon, Maine, New Hampshire, and West Virginia.
After the general election, right?
No, during the period June through October 2004
I presume #1 is saying that the *hearing* has been postponed until after the general election. . . .
The hearing is November 5, 3 days after the 2010 election.