According to this story, the New York Republican Party will go to court to remove Jim Russell from the November 2, 2010 ballot. He won the Republican Party primary for U.S. House, 18th district, by default. No one else qualified to run for the Republican nomination for that seat. The Republican Party is opposed to Russell because he seems to have publicly advocated that people only marry members of their same ethnic group. Thanks to Eric Garris for the link.
In 2008, Russell was the Republican nominee for the same seat. He was the Conservative Party nominee for the same seat as well.
A Sense of Peoplehood is not a Pathology.
It is not racist for a professor such as Alan Dershowitz or for an ex-professor like Jim Russell, who wants to run for congress, to advocate for their ethnic group interests.
It is about group interests.
A race or an ethnie without a sense of peoplehood or ethnichood will end up being used to achieve the goals of other ethnies. (Yes, ethnie, not ethnic).
The feelings or thoughts for peoplehood is not a pathology. The European-American will have White ethnic interests and it is not racist to have them. Just as Hispanics, Asians, Jews and Blacks have their own ethnic interests, it should not be a pathology for Whites to have ethnic interests.
Remember, an Ethnie without a sense of peoplehood will end up being used to achieve the goals of other ethnies. — Michael Santomauro
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?
So thinking it is OK to kill babies in the womb is all part of the big tent, but opposing interracial marriage can not be tolerated?
Where are those blood oaths — to obey the party hack party line (aka party hack Platform) OR ELSE ???
P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.
“Social views” is a euphemism for racism, Richard.
Pingback: Suburban NYC candidate loses Republican support – Wall Street Journal | Conservatives for America
Urgh! What an ass. Guess that counts me out, since I’m married to a Chinese woman.
Congrats to the NY GOP for taking this stance.
This is fairly vague and tentative stuff:
…parents should teach their children “an acceptance of appropriate ethnic boundaries for socialization and for marriage.”
I’m sure a lot of Indian parents(especially) have conversations along those lines with their children.
And as far as “the party of Lincoln” goes, I’m fairly sure that whenever Lincoln publicly spoke about miscegenation he was “agin’ it.”
This is probably the real reason he’s being dumped:
In a long recitation of the accomplishments of Western civilization, he also quoted T.S. Eliot as writing, “reasons of race and culture combine to make any large number of freethinking Jews undesirable.”
Any folks see the recent PBS series about gene stuff in humans / ALL life on Mother Earth ???
Control genes – switch genes – protein genes — along with BAD genes – causing genetic diseases.
How much forced sex in the slave State regimes before the 13th Amdt was ratified in Dec. 1865 ???
Any folks see the PBS WW II colour/color show about the Hitler 1941 invasion of the ex-U.S.S.R. (a TOTAL race/class war) — and his major defeats in 1943 – Stalingrad and Kursk ???
I am interested in how the GOP is dealing with the removal issue. In California the American Independent
Party Convention voted to not have a candidate for Governor, because the party did not want Chelene Nightingale to represent the AIP on the November, 2010
ballot.
Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party.
Why is it “racist” when whites seek to be amongst themselves, but never “racist” when anyone else does?