At the end of May 2011, the Socialist Party launched a petition drive to get itself on the Michigan ballot. Probably 2,000 signatures have been collected so far. The law requires 32,261 valid signatures. However, the law also requires already-qualified parties to poll only 16,083 votes in November 2010 in order to stay on the ballot.
The Socialist Party believes it can at least get 16,083 valid signatures by the petition deadline, July 19, 2012. If so, it plans to file a lawsuit, alleging that the existing law discriminates against new parties, and in favor of old parties, by requiring twice as much support for a newly qualifying party to get on the ballot as it requires an old party to remain on. The U.S. Supreme Court 1968 decision Williams v Rhodes suggested that states cannot discriminate against old parties. Also, the four concurring justices in Communist Party of Indiana v Whitcomb, in 1974, said, “In Williams v Rhodes, this Court held that a discriminatory preference for established parties can justified only by a ‘compelling state interest’.” The Indiana ruling struck down an Indiana loyalty oath for political parties, but Indiana exempted the old parties from the oath. The concurring justices said the Indiana oath was unconstitutional because the law exempted old parties. The other five justices struck down the Indiana oath on First Amendment grounds.
ALL of the SCOTUS ballot access cases since 1968 are full of IRRATIONAL party hack UN-equal stuff regarding minor parties and independents — regardless of the EQUAL protection clause in 14th Amdt, Sec. 1.
How much EQUAL protection did even WHITE Elephants require in the ex-slave States after the Civil War ended in 1865 ???
Lots of MINDLESS hair-splitting by the SCOTUS robot party hacks — trying to be *democratic* but being actually totally oligarchial — i.e. keeping the extremist party hack robot Donkeys and Elephants in power at ALL costs.
Which Fed gerrymander law will really set things off ???
P.R. and nonpartisan App.V.
Pingback: Michigan Socialist Party Launches 2012 Petitioning Drive | ThirdPartyPolitics.us
Best of luck to the socialists in their efforts. Maybe they can turn things around in Michigan with regards to ballot access discrimintion against third parties.
OTOH, you have quoted a federal judge in Michigan who said the reason for a petition was just to indicate you wanted more candidates on the ballot, and not that they actually want to vote for them.
If the Socialist’s sue, they might not want to cite that case.
Pingback: Michigan Socialist Party Launches 2012 Petition Drive | Independent Political Report