On July 11, a New Jersey Superior Court ordered the production of printouts, maintenance logs and reports, and machine-testing procedure tapes, from the primary last month. Two Democratic candidates for Fairfield Township party office in Cumberland County earlier produced affidavits from enough voters who swore they had voted for them, to persuasively show that the Sequoia AVC Advantage vote-counting machine undercounted their votes. See this story.
What percentage of votes in the U.S.A. are rigged — as if the gerrymander rigged votes are not enough ???
Thanks for this. I posted to the SC Progressive Network page. The manufacturer is different (here it is iVotronic machines made by ES&S), but the problem of unaccountable voting is the same in SC.
A google search on iVotronic will reveal a history of the similar problems.
Ohio, 2004.
This country still hasn’t learned one damned lesson about clean elections.
@TonyS:
I was a recount observer in 2004 for 3 different Ohio counties. I was satisfied that the ballots cast were correctly counted in the counties I observed.
This, of course, doesn’t mean that there were voter intimidation problems or other issues with the way the election was run.
4 –
Many others were not. So let’s settle this. Let’s run a poll and have Diebold tally and report the results.
The election was for a Democratic county committee. All the candidates and votes were for Democrats.
The headline would be more accurate to say “… Voting Machine Reported Too Few Votes For Zirkles”
Thank you, Jim.