Nationally-organized minor parties, which are traditionally under-funded, nevertheless sometimes have enough funding to provide a significant boost to a single nominee, or a handful of nominees, for important office. But such parties then have a problem deciding in an objective manner which of their many nominees to support.
Alex Snitker has written this proposal for his party, the Libertarian Party. It involves an internal national party vote, by rank-and-file members, to decide which three Libertarian U.S. House nominees should get the party’s full financial help. All voters would qualify by donating $25 to the fund that would ultimately go to the chosen nominees. Alex Snitker was the Libertarian Party’s U.S. Senate nominee in Florida in 2010. He now acknowledges that U.S. Senate campaigns are too expensive, and he limits his proposal to U.S. House races.
The idea might face an obstacle from the part of the McCain-Feingold law that limits how much money national political parties can donate to their own nominees, although these limits do not apply if the spending is not coordinated with the nominees.
Pingback: Alex Snitker Suggests a Plan on How a Nationally-Organized Minor Party Can Objectively Decide Which Congressional Candidates for Funding | ThirdPartyPolitics.us
Great article and great plan! I think it’s definitely going to take this type of targeted strategy to get a Libertarian candidate elected to Congress.
I especially like the following point Alex Snitker makes:
“Making this a competition will also improve all the campaigns — not just the winners. All campaigns in the competition will have to step up their game, and win or lose, their campaign will be better for the effort. This will also give those winning candidates a victory under their belt. That mental victory will make them even better.”
I like Alex Snitker’s idea and the way it would work. I will help support it to make it a success.
Great idea! I had an idea like this myself.