On November 18, the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission heard a challenge to whether President Obama’s name should remain on the New Hampshire Democratic Party presidential primary ballot. See this story. According to the story, at least two New Hampshire state representatives, Harry Accornero and Susan DeLemus, supported the challenge. However, the Commission voted 5-0 to retain Obama’s name on the ballot.
The story says that the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office advised the Commission that it has no power to evaluate a challenge to a presidential candidate’s ballot status, if the candidate paid the filing fee. The Attorney General’s position seems to agree with a California State Court of Appeals decision of October 25, 2010, in Keyes v Bowen, which said a California Secretary of State has no discretion to evaluate the qualifications of a presidential nominee, and “must (the word is italicized in the opinion) place on the ballot the names of the several political parties’ candidates.”
The challenges to Obama’s ballot status have larger legal implications than are usually realized. If state officials must place the names of presidential candidates on various ballots, that strengthens the precedents established by John Anderson, Robert La Follette, Theodore Roosevelt, Gus Hall, Lyndon LaRouche, and David Duke, over the last hundred years, that just because a presidential candidate appeared on a presidential primary ballot, there is no authority to keep him or her off general election ballots under a different label. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for the link.
All five members of the Ballot Commission are Democrats which may be a violation of the law. Developing… Here is the article: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/18/exclusive-orly-taitz-reports-on-new-hampshire-ballot-commission-hearing
@Jeff Becker
No they are not. Mr. Cook and Mr. French are Republicans. As usual, Taitz and the PestandEfail are lying.
The Commission followed the law. Orly admitted she had no real evidence of her insane claims.
A candidate IS or IS NOT qualified to be elected.
How soon before Civil WAR II starts – due to the usual suspect robot party hacks ???
To: Mary Adams,
You stated that Mr. Cook and Mr. French are Republicans.
Due you have a CV for them? Last April, BO came out with a purported long form Birth Certificate on line.
Yet, I and others noted kerning on the purported document. Dr. Taitz stated that it was not created with a typewriter because the document had kerning. I have not followed that one, because some typewriters do kerning, e.g., IBM Selectric.
It comes down to this. If Barack H. Obama II was born
on August 4, 1961, how did he board the SS Uganda on
August 28, 1961 (24 days after being born at the Port
of Mombasa Island in the Indian Ocean off the coast of
Kenya!? The ship arrived at Tilbury Docks, Port of London on September 20, 1961. Stanley Ann Obama started
classes at the University of Washington, Seattle Extension on September 25, 1961.
People should note that Stanley Ann registered by mail
(not in person for these extention classes). The date
of approved registration was August 19, 1961 (a Saturday). When we were using the August 13, 1961 date,
date of the South bound voyage of the S. S. Uganda (original told to me as the departure date in 2008)
there was a problem where an airmail letter would have
been posted from and when if Stanley Ana departed on August 13th for the letter to arrive on the 19th. One of the passengers on the North bound voyage kept records of the passengers
until his arrival in France on September 12, 1961. This agent boarded the S. S. Uganda on August 25, 1961 at Dar es Salaam and left the ship at Marseille on September 12, 1961 with Stanley Ann Obama and her child
still aboard. The Mossad has a copy of the passenger list of that North bound voyage of all passengers that
boarded the S.S. Uganda out of Mombasa on August 28,
1961, since a Mossad agent board the North bound voyage
at Dar es Saleem on August 25, 1961. Stanley Ann did
not leave Mombasa Island until she had word of her admission to the University of Washington, Seattle Extention (which took place on August 19, 1961). Remember, on August 31, 1961, Barack H. Obama I knew he
hand a child born on August 4, 1961, but did not claim
to know the location of mother and child to the INS investigator. He did know that Stanley Ann was excepted
at the University of Washington (SIC.) for September, 1961 classes.
Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Chairman,
American Indepandent Party
# 4 Have you reported your allegations to the Congress and to all State Attorney Generals ???
1787 NBC = AT birth allegiance to a regime — based on the nation-state status of the father at the second of birth of the kid — repeated in 14th Amdt, Sec. 1 (1868).
Way too difficult for armies of MORONS to understand — who have an area fixation – *place* of birth fixation.
Thus NO NBC status for ANY kid born in the U.S.A. who has a foreign nation-state father — whether the mother and kid is legally OR illegally in the U.S.A. — with an invading foreign army, tourists, on business, with a foreign goverment staff, shipwrecked, etc.
Gee – What was the nation-state status of the father of B.H.O. when he was born in 1961 ???
Gee – what now about test tube kids ??? The mind boggles more than a bit.
The NH ballot commission is illegal because they are all
Democrats. They should all be removed from office,by force if. necessary
Pingback: Representative Present at NH Ballot Law Commission Hearing Responds to Request for Investigation| The Post & Email