A U.S. District Court in Missouri is expediting a lawsuit over how many signatures are needed to place local initiatives on the ballot in certain cities. The case is being expedited because the election is scheduled for April 3, 2012.
Missouri state law says a local initiative needs signatures equal to 25% of the last Mayoral vote. But in Poplar Bluff, voters don’t elect Mayors directly. Voters merely vote for city councilmembers, and they choose a Mayor. City officials determined that because there is no direct popular vote for Mayor, initiatives need 25% of the number of registered voters in Poplar Bluff. Proponents of an initiative sued because they say the number of signatures should be 25% of all the votes cast for City Council. Proponents of an initiative did collect enough valid signatures, if their theory of how to calculate the requirement is accepted. The case is Rexroat v City of Poplar Bluff, eastern district, 1:11-cv-224. Here is the complaint. The ACLU is handling the case.
The initiative concerns city-provided cable TV services. The city government is clearly hostile to the initiative. The city’s web page has a prominent place on the opening page, explaining how residents may delete their signatures from the petition. Thanks to Nate Carraw for this news.
Since when do State MORONS have ANY idea of what local regimes do ???
A whole lot of MORON stuff happens due to very early State laws NOT being updated.
How about a SUPREME election law Court in each State and Fed area ???
No shortage of cases for such courts due to all sorts of moron laws/ regs/ ordinances, moron election law bureaucrats, moron plaintiffs, moron lawyers, etc. etc.
See the specialized Fed courts for patents, etc. — since election law has become more and more byzantine INSANE due to the EVIL gerrymander monsters in the gerrymander Congress and all 50 State legislatures.