Georgia Hearing on Presidential Qualifications is Held, but Administrative Law Judge Issues No Decision So Far

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has this story about the January 26 hearing in Atlanta over presidential qualifications. The story seems to make an error when it refers to the November ballot. The hearing concerns what names should be on the Georgia Democratic presidential primary ballot on March 6.


Comments

Georgia Hearing on Presidential Qualifications is Held, but Administrative Law Judge Issues No Decision So Far — No Comments

  1. Update – Judge Malihi has stated that he will enter a “DEFAULT JUDGEMENT” against Obama.
    THE JUDGE HAS STATED HE WILL BE FORMALIZING HIS VERDICT BY FEBRUARY 5TH.
    The Georgia Secretary of State has already stated that he will follow the Judges Recommendations. That mean that Barack Hussein Obama will NOT APPEAR on the Great State of Georgia Presidential Ballot in 2012!
    SOURCE: http://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/georgia-hearing-blow-by-blow

  2. Jeff Becker’s update appears to be based on a hoax story that is floating around the Internet today on web sites that do not appear to have any credibility.

  3. 5 –

    No problem, Mr. Ed.

    I have a suggestion. Every now and again share a recipe or make a Super Bowl prediction…anything to let us all know you think about anything else besides this ludicrous red herring.

    Cheers.

  4. Each person, elected or appointed, does or does NOT have the qualifications to hold ANY public office — commonly called the Rule of LAW — regardless of armies of juvenile MORONS with their flippant comments.

  5. # 10 The New Age of rotted- to- the- core public so-called schools has produced armies of morons who are cannon fodder for the robot party hacks — esp. absolute monarch types.

    Civilization barely hangs on by a very thin thread — being attacked nonstop by the flippant MORONS.

    More and more Bush v. Gore 2000 type HAMMER opinions are needed to hammer the skulls of the morons.

    FL 2000 — NO definition of what was a LEGAL vote using the various ballot systems.

    Result – the BvG HAMMER on the ENTIRE FL regime of MORONS – legislative, executive and judicial.

    More HAMMER stuff in the 2002 Fed HAVA law – requiring MORON regimes to have a definition of a legal vote with their various ballot systems.

    Gee – any States NOT having such definitions ???

    ALL election stuff is basically YES or NO —

    Qualified Elector ???
    Registered ???
    Qualified candidate ???
    Legal vote for candidate ???
    Etc. Etc.

  6. #11 typo have produced instead of has produced in the first line.

    #12 Not sure what needs to be clarified ???

    NBC = at birth Allegiance to a nation-state based on father’s nation-state status.

    Naturalization = change in Allegiance AFTER birth — generally after becoming an adult.

    See the various group naturalization laws after foreign areas were added to the U.S.A. after the 1783 U.S.A.-Brit Peace Treaty —
    LA Territory
    Florida
    W/S.W. areas – U.S.A.- Mexico Peace Treaty
    NW areas
    Alaska
    Etc.

    Surviving American Indians naturalized in 1924/1940 laws.

  7. Important update! Judge Malihi expedites the date for post trial motions. Moves it from February 5th to February 1st, will issue his ruling shortly thereafter

    Posted on | January 27, 2012 | No Comments

    Judge Malihi shortened the time to file any post trial trial pleadings. He moved the date from February 5th to February 1. He will issue his ruling shortly thereafter. I believe, he will issue his ruling by the end of the day on February 1 or on February 2 at the latest. I believe Brian Kemp, the Secretary of State of GA, will announce on February 2 or 3rd whether Barack Hussein Obama’s name will be allowed on the ballot in the state of GA as an eligible Presidential candidate.

  8. There are more then two ways on can be a citizen. First, Eskimos did not become citizens until January, 1941. That was by a collective naturalization Act of
    Congress, viz., not the 14th Amendment.

    By the Act of August 4, 1937, persons born in the Republic of Panama, who had a parent that at one time
    was a citizen of the United States but had lost their citzenship, viz., by marriage to an alien husband if one was employed by the United States Government or
    the Panama Rail Road Company received a collective naturalization from Congress.

    At one time persons born in Western Canada had received a collective naturation by Congress under the terms of the Garfield Act, viz, born in Oregon Country.

    Remember. part of Oregon Country was the remainder of the Territory of Michigan. The Garfield Act was away
    Congress ended some stateless persons status in the 19th century.

    Also note that John S. McCain III was not covered under the the terms of the Act of August 4, 1937, because his parents did not have a lawful marriage in Baja California in 1933, they had the same type of bogus
    marriage that Ike and Tina Turner had in T.J. at a bar.
    Also lawful marriages in Baja California from 1927 to the Present take place in the Office of the Civil Registry of Baja California. Yes John S. McCain III was
    born out of lawful wedlock to mom Roberta Wright at the
    Colen Hospital, Republic of Panama. He was not born in the Panama Canal Zone. Mom did not have the required
    employment. The punative father John McCain II was employed by the United States Government, but because he was not wed to Roberta Wright at John S. McCain III,
    birth, McCain was and is not a citizen of the United States.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Chairman, American Independent Party

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.