The 2004 campaign season was almost eight years ago, and yet three courts are still pondering how to rule on various Ralph Nader lawsuits stemming from the 2004 election. As readers know, the Democratic National Committee and its allies spent millions of dollars, actively trying to block Ralph Nader from the ballot in as many states as possible.

The Democratic National Committee never reported these expenses to the Federal Election Commission. Nader sued the FEC in U.S. District Court in Washington for failing to investigate this reporting lapse. The District Court ruled in November 2011 that the FEC’s failure to follow its own rules in this matter was “harmless error”, and dismissed Nader’s lawsuit. Nader asked for a rehearing on December 9, 2011, and it is still pending. It is unusual for rehearing requests to remain pending for that length of time. Usually they are denied in less than a month, especially when the decision is before only a single judge.

Nader sued the Democratic National Committee, and the Maine Democratic Party, over its behavior in 2004. Several Nader lawsuits of this type were dismissed on the grounds that he had filed the lawsuits too late, but the Maine case does not have this problem, because Maine has a six year statute of limitations. The lower state court in Maine refused to permit a trial in the case, which is called Nader v The Maine Democratic Party. On September 14, 2011, Nader argued in the Maine Supreme Court that the lower court should have permitted a trial. It is now been almost six months and the Maine Supreme Court has not issued a decision.

The people who challenged Nader’s 2004 Pennsylvania petition have been trying for years to obtain money from one of Nader’s bank accounts in the District of Columbia. The Pennsylvania state courts had ruled that the challengers were entitled to over $80,000 from Nader, because the Pennsylvania courts had ruled Nader’s 2004 petition didn’t have enough valid signatures. One of Nader’s banks still hasn’t released the money to the challengers. On April 21,2010, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on whether the money should be released, and there is still no decision in that case, even though it has been almost two years since the oral argument. That case is Serody v Nader.